PubMed · 2654698
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Brancadoro. 1989-02-15. [Why post-resection gastroduodenostomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2654698/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastro-jejunostomy is appropriate for patients with severe neurologic deficit to avoid repeated tube feeding-related aspiration. We describe a modified technique of endoscopic gastro-duodenostomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This technique was performed in 9 patients with severe neurologic deficit. No fluoroscopy was necessary. The gastrostomy button was pushed across the pylorus into the bulb; a nasogastric tube was then placed in the duodenum under endoscopic control and the button was drawn to the gastric wall. When the gastroduodenal tube migrated or was occluded, the button was placed in the bulb through the pylorus and maintained in this position for alimentation. RESULTS: Placement of the gastro-duodenostomy tube was successful without any complication in 100% of patients. The mean duration of the procedure was 15 min. The tube had to be removed for migration (N = 4) and occlusion (N = 5) after a mean period of 5.8 weeks (range: 2-10). During the follow-up period, no tube feeding-related aspiration was observed. CONCLUSION: This modified low-cost technique of endoscopic gastro-duodenostomy is simple and efficient.
PURPOSE: After reconstruction of jejunal atresias at the ligament of Treitz, many patients do not respond to simple tapering and anastomosis requiring repetitive operations because of dysfunction of dilated proximal bowel. A new operative approach using lateral duodenectomy and duodenojejunostomy (LDAD) is reported. METHODS: Three infants with atresias within 10 cm of the ligament of Treitz were treated with LDAD, and their records are reviewed retrospectively. The entire duodenum is visualized after creating a malrotation; this is followed by opening the dilated duodenum and resecting dilated proximal jejunum. The resection is extended proximally, incorporating the lateral duodenal incision, excising the lateral duodenal wall, and preserving the ampulla. The residual duodenum is fashioned into a tube and anastomosed to the spatulated distal jejunum. RESULTS: Three infants underwent this procedure over a 4-year period. Two had undergone tapering enteroplasties previously but were unable to tolerate oral feedings; 1 infant had LDAD primarily. All were ultimately successfully managed by LDAD and were feeding within 14 days. Follow-up is from 14 to 49 months. CONCLUSION: Although experience is limited to 3 patients, the prompt return of intestinal function with LDAD may justify primary use of this more radical procedure in difficult-to-treat proximal atresias.
Between 1975 and 1980, 30 patients with type I corporeal gastric ulcer were randomly allocated to undergo selective proximal vagotomy with ulcer excision or partial gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy. Sixteen patients underwent selective proximal vagotomy (1 was excluded from the follow-up since microscopic examination of the excised ulcer revealed an early gastric cancer) and 14 underwent partial gastrectomy. No significant differences in the clinical results were found 3 years after surgery. During a median follow-up of 10 years, ulcer recurred in 3 patients after selective proximal vagotomy and in 2 after partial gastrectomy. One patient in each group had recurrent ulcer without symptoms and received no treatment. Two selective proximal vagotomy patients and three partial gastrectomy patients had epigastric pain with or without ulcer. One patient with selective proximal vagotomy underwent a second operation because of epigastric pain and recurrent ulcer. Bowel habits remained unchanged in all but one patient in each group, and mild or moderate dumping was recorded for two patients in each group. Very good or good results (modified Visick scale) were recorded for 11 of 15 patients after selective proximal vagotomy and for 10 of 14 patients after partial gastrectomy. Except for one patient in each group who had moderate dumping, patients classified as Visick III or IV had no symptoms during treatment with antacids or H2-blockers, or had asymptomatic ulcers and needed no treatment. Selective proximal vagotomy reduced the median acid response to insulin hypoglycemia and to pentagastrin by 100% and 80%, respectively, for at least 3 to 5 years, and partial gastrectomy reduced the median acid response to pentagastrin by 97%. In our opinion, selective proximal vagotomy with ulcer excision is an alternative to partial gastrectomy for surgically treating type I gastric ulcer.