Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 263395

Leukocyte function after aortic valve replacement.

B Kvarstein·J Dale
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Leukocyte function was studied in patients with prosthetic heart valves by oxygen consumption measurements during phagocytosis of polystyrene latex particles. The consumption reflects the phagocytotic capacity of the cells. In 38 patients with Starr-Edwards aortic ball valves the mean oxygen consumption was 3.95 nanoatoms per minute per 10(6) leukocytes, as compared to 4.15 in 50 healthy subjects, the difference not being statistically significant. The number of leukocytes per ml. of blood and the distribution of cell types was quite similar in the two groups, although slightly more younger cells were found in the patients. It is concluded that the capacity for phagocytosis is not significantly reduced after aortic ball valve implantation.

Explore related subjects

Aortic ValveFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseLeukocyte CountLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionPhagocytosisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Kvarstein, J Dale. 1978. Leukocyte function after aortic valve replacement.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(78)90199-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Combined cardiac surgery and liver transplantation.

During evaluation for liver transplantation, a 63-year-old man with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area, 0.87 cm(2)) and coronary artery disease. A combined procedure involving aortic valve replacement (pericardial xenograft), coronary artery bypass surgery, and orthotopic liver transplantation was performed. Convalescence was uneventful, and at 2 years after the procedure, the patient has normal cardiac function, good prosthetic valve function, and biochemically normal liver function.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed2000

Prospectively randomized comparison of different mechanical aortic valves.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospectively randomized study was to evaluate the hemodynamic and functional outcomes after aortic valve replacement with 3 different bileaflet mechanical valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive ATS (n=100), Carbomedics (n=100), or St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus (n=100) mechanical aortic valve replacement. There were no significant differences regarding patient age (average 61+/-8 years), body surface area (1.9+/-0.2 m(2)), left ventricular function (ejection fraction 0.59+/-0.17), and presence of aortic stenosis (90%, 89%, and 91%), respectively. All patients had postoperative as well as 6-month and 1-year follow-ups that included transthoracic echocardiography. Multivariate statistical analysis was performed. Implanted valve sizes were comparable at 24+/-2 (ATS), 23.7+/-1.6 (CM), and 23.6+/-1.9 (SJMHP) mm (NS). At 1-year follow-up, the following incidence of events was noted: death 3/1/1, all non-valve related; stroke 0/1/1; trivial transvalvular incompetence 3/3/2; paravalvular leak 2/3/2; and reoperation 0/1/1, respectively (NS). Transvalvular flow velocities were 2.5/2.6/2.4 m/s postoperatively (P:=0.03) and 2.4/2.4/2.3 m/s at 6-month follow-up, respectively (NS). There was a significant decrease in left ventricular mass for all patients but no significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are no clinically relevant differences among the tested bileaflet aortic valves. Regardless of valve type, there was a low complication rate. On the basis of these findings, all 3 bileaflet prostheses are well suited for aortic valve replacement.

Aortic Valve↗