Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2623057

Female rats in a competitive situation: medial hypothalamic lesions increase and ovariectomy decreases success and aggression.

Abstract

Competition for food was observed between pairs of ovariectomized female rats with medial hypothalamic lesions or sham lesions. A second series of tests observed food-competition between ovariectomized and sham-ovariectomized females. Competing pairs were continuously housed together and maintained on a 23-hr food-deprivation schedule. Competition occurred as each rat attempted to maintain access to a spout containing liquid food that only one animal could lick at a time. Female rats made hyperdefensive by medial hypothalamic lesions maintained access to a food spout significantly longer than their sham-lesioned cagemates. The lesioned animals were also significantly more aggressive than their sham-lesioned cagemates. Sham-ovariectomized rats maintained access to the food spout significantly longer than their ovariectomized cagemates. The intact cagemates were also more aggressive. These results suggest that defensive aggression heightened by medial hypothalamic lesions is displayed in a competitive situation by females as has been demonstrated previously with males. Further, ovariectomy in females appears to decrease aggression and success in a competitive situation as does gonadectomy in males. These results suggest that homologous biological mechanisms modulate aggressive behavior in male and female rats.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Albert, D M Petrovic, M L Walsh. 1989. Female rats in a competitive situation: medial hypothalamic lesions increase and ovariectomy decreases success and aggression.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(89)90007-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of deception: cheaters are punished in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

From a functional perspective, deception can evolve in animal populations but should be constrained by the costs associated with detection. It then follows that withholding information should be more prevalent as a form of deception than active falsification of information because of the relative difficulties associated with detecting cheaters. Empirical studies of deception have focused on the benefits of cheating but have provided no data on the costs associated with being detected as a cheater. I present results from field experiments on rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) which show that individuals discovering food announce their discoveries by calling on 45% of all trials. Discoverers who failed to call, but were detected with food by other group members, received significantly more aggression than vocal discoverers. Moreover, silent female discoverers ate significantly less food than vocal females. This demonstrates that there are significant costs to withholding information. Such costs may constrain the frequency with which deception occurs in this and other populations.

Aggression