Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2603177

Understanding informed consent.

Abstract

The failure of a physician to disclose all of the risks associated with an operative procedure is considered a breach of professional duty and, therefore, a negligent act. Consent for a procedure does not necessarily have to be written; however, signed forms provide written evidence of the patient's agreement. Documentation is essential, especially in cases where the consent form is incomplete or incorrectly filled out. Any concerns about a patient's consent or lack of consent should be discussed with the surgeon.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Bailey-Allen. 1989. Understanding informed consent.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2603177/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Prevention of thrombosis in medical patients--documentation is missing].

A questionnaire regarding current routines for thromboprophylaxis was distributed to all 63 medical departments in Norwegian hospitals; 58 (92%) responded. All departments declared that they practiced prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism, and in most departments the decision (as to whether to practice prophylaxis) was left to the physicians. Written guidelines were used in only 12 departments, 21% of those who responded. The indications listed were those associated with a particular risk of thrombosis. Previous thrombosis and malignancy were listed less frequently than expected. There is a need for specific evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. In our opinion this requires that further placebo-controlled studies be carried out.

Documentation