Texture interactions determine perceived contrast.

C Chubb; G Sperling; J A Solomon

doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9631

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2594791

Texture interactions determine perceived contrast.

C Chubb·G Sperling·J A Solomon

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For a patch of random visual texture embedded in a surrounding background of similar texture, we demonstrate that the perceived contrast of the texture patch depends substantially on the contrast of the background. When the texture patch is surrounded by high-contrast texture, the bright points of the texture patch appear dimmer, and simultaneously, its dark points appear less dark than when it is surrounded by a uniform background. The induced reduction of apparent contrast is greatly diminished when (i) the texture patch and background are filtered into nonoverlapping spatial frequency bands or (ii) the texture patch and background are presented to different eyes. Our results are unanticipated by all current theories of lightness perception and point to a perceptual mechanism for contrast gain control occurring at an early cortical or precortical neural locus.

Explore related subjects

Contrast Sensitivity Darkness Humans Photic Stimulation Space Perception Time Factors Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C Chubb, G Sperling, J A Solomon. 1989. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast.. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.23.9631

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.

One hundred and one coronary interventional systems (45 primarily film-based predigital systems, labeled group 1; and 56 filmless digital systems, labeled group 2) were examined over a 5-year period using a standardized imaging phantom. Fluoroscopic image intensifier input dose, high-contrast spatial resolution, low-contrast sensitivity, and static and dynamic low-contrast resolution were assessed under several conditions simulating patient body habitus. The distribution of spatial resolutions in group 2 facilities favored higher line pair resolution over group 1 (P = 0.01). Contrast sensitivity (smallest-diameter hole visualized) was consistently and significantly enhanced with the use of digital imaging under both medium (P = 0.001) and large (P = 0.002) patient habitus simulations. Low-contrast video resolution (number of wires seen) under static (P = 0.007) and dynamic (P = 0.002) conditions was also improved in the digital facilities. However, image intensifer input dose was similar in both groups (group 1 median dose, 23 mR/min; group 2 median dose, 26 mR/min; P = NS). Fluoroscopic spatial resolution in digital filmless laboratories was significantly improved when compared to predigital, film-based laboratories. Low-contrast sensitivity and low- contrast video resolution under both static and dynamic conditions were also significantly improved in the digital laboratories. Notably, the input dose of radiation required to produce these improved fluoroscopic images was similar between groups.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2003

Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception.

The horizontal separation of the eyes results in the projection of slightly different images in each eye that are used to recover depth. One source of depth information is disparity, the relative position of paired features in the two eyes. Another source of depth information comes from features that are present in only one eye's view. These unpaired features arise from occlusion and by definition cannot generate a conventional disparity signal. Here we compare the depth signals generated by paired and unpaired features using stimuli that differ only in whether a given feature (a vertical gap) is paired or unpaired. Ecologically, both stimuli are consistent with two panels separated in depth at the gap, but only the paired gap provides a conventional disparity signal. We found strikingly that depth thresholds for the two gap conditions were the same and that there was perfect cross-adaptation of perceived depth from the unpaired to paired condition, strongly suggesting a common mechanism.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2003

Human temporal impulse response speeds up with increased stimulus contrast.

It is well known that raising mean luminance speeds-up the visual response to temporal change. At higher mean luminance, the temporal impulse response function (IRF) becomes more transient or biphasic. An analogous effect is observed physiologically when stimulus contrast is increased, at constant mean luminance. As stimulus contrast is raised, the temporal response to flicker advances in phase and becomes more transient (bandpass). The MC (magnocellular) retinal ganglion cells manifest this temporal contrast gain control, but the PC (parvocellular) cells do not. We show psychophysically that the temporal response in humans speeds-up in an analogous manner as stimulus contrast is raised. Low spatial-frequency gratings, of suprathreshold contrast, were presented as pairs of pulses, separated by brief delays. Responses became more transient with increasing contrast in both our motion task (direction discrimination) and in our flicker task ('agitation' discrimination), mimicking the temporal contrast gain control seen in the physiological studies. Results could be modeled with a nonlinearity, in which the IRF shortens with increasing contrast.

Contrast Sensitivity↗