Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2586629

[Peripheral vision--function and significance].

Abstract

The human retina may be divided into two parts, representing different functional capabilities: the center, i.e., the fovea, and the much greater periphery. Under photopic conditions the fovea has a very high spatial resolution, a high light-difference sensitivity, and a good perception of slow movements. Opposed to this the periphery shows an especially high temporal resolution and a good perception of fast movements. This enables the visual system to detect dangerous objects appearing in the periphery as soon as possible and to induce a detailed analysis in the fovea after triggering a fixational movement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Lachenmayr. 1989. [Peripheral vision--function and significance].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00366220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Nomenclature of the macular area].

There is a confusion in terminology of macular area of the retina. Particularly in Japanese, the word "fovea" has been used both for clinical term of the very center of the fovea (foveola) and for the anatomical term of fovea centralis. Therefore, whenever the term "fovea" is used in ophthalmology, one has to specify which meaning the word is being used for. This is the main reason why we propose to revise the nomenclature of the macular area. Based upon the historic background of histological findings regarding the macular area of the retina, the most suitable term instead for clinical use is discussed. In conclusion, we propose the term "macular foveola" or simply "foveola" for clinical use in place of the term "fovea". In this revision, the clinical terms will be macular area, macula (lutea), and macular foveola or foveola, and the anatomical terms, area centralis, macula (lutea), fovea centralis, and foveola. We hope this will eliminate the confusion in terminology of the macular area.

Fovea Centralis

Effect of window size on detection acuity and resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in central and peripheral vision.

Detection and resolution of square patches of sinusoidal gratings were measured in central and peripheral vision (30 degrees horizontal temporal visual field) for high-contrast gratings as a function of the number of cycles in the stimulus. We determined performance in a forced-choice paradigm for a fixed number of stimulus cycles by arranging for stimulus diameter to vary inversely with spatial frequency. For both psychophysical tasks and for both target locations, the psychometric function relating performance to log spatial frequency shifted to higher frequencies without changing slope significantly as the number of cycles in the stimulus was increased. Thus the entire effect could be captured by an analysis of spatial acuity, which increased with increasing number of grating cycles over the range 0.5-6 cycles but remained constant over the range 6-14 cycles. In the central field, resolution acuity and detection acuity were equal regardless of the number of cycles in the stimulus. In the peripheral field, detection acuity exceeded resolution acuity and perceptual aliasing occurred for stimuli in the range 1-14 cycles. From this result we conclude that resolution acuity is sampling limited in the periphery, provided that the stimulus contains at least one full cycle of the grating. Essential features of the results could be accounted for by Fourier analysis of the stimulus.

Fovea Centralis

Optical coherence tomography of the human retina.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate optical coherence tomography for high-resolution, noninvasive imaging of the human retina. Optical coherence tomography is a new imaging technique analogous to ultrasound B scan that can provide cross-sectional images of the retina with micrometer-scale resolution. DESIGN: Survey optical coherence tomographic examination of the retina, including the macula and optic nerve head in normal human subjects. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of normal human subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of optical coherence retinal tomographs with known normal retinal anatomy. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomographs can discriminate the cross-sectional morphologic features of the fovea and optic disc, the layered structure of the retina, and normal anatomic variations in retinal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses with 10-microns depth resolution. CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography is a potentially useful technique for high depth resolution, cross-sectional examination of the fundus.

Fovea Centralis