Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2572239

Paternity testing.

Abstract

There is evidence that parentage determination was a problem even in biblical times. The most significant developments in resolving these problems occurred in the 20th century starting with Landsteiner's description of the ABO blood group system in 1900. The utility of paternity testing increased as new blood group systems were identified. Major advances occurred between 1940 and 1970, starting with the discovery of the Rh system and reaching a highpoint with the application of HLA typing to paternity studies. Although the exclusion of falsely accused alleged fathers continues as the primary focus of paternity testing, statistical analysis has contributed significantly to the information that can be gleaned from the test results when exclusion has not been demonstrated. Paternal inclusion still cannot be conclusively proven but a mathematical estimation of the likelihood of paternity has found legal acceptance. New technology is now being directed toward identifying inherited DNA markers through the use of genetic probes. Segregation of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) may provide the near ultimate test for paternity as it may supply indisputable evidence of family relationships.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Silver. 1989. Paternity testing.. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408368909106594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry