PubMed · 2564284
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Edwards. 1989-01-21. Blasted with ennui.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6667.136
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In mice, the recreational drug (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA ("ecstasy")] produces a selective toxic effect on brain dopamine (DA) neurons. Using cDNA microarray technology in combination with an approach designed to facilitate recognition of relevant changes in gene expression, the present studies sought to identify genes potentially involved in murine MDMA-induced toxicity to DA neurons. Of 15,000 mouse cDNA fragments studied, metallothionein (Mt)-1 and Mt2 emerged as candidate genes possibly involved in MDMA-induced toxicity to DA neurons. Northern blot analysis confirmed the microarray findings and revealed a dynamic upregulation of Mt1 and Mt2 mRNA in the ventral midbrain within 4-12 hr after MDMA treatment. Western blot analysis showed a similar increase in MT protein levels, with peak times occurring subsequent to increases in mRNA levels. Mt1-2 double knock-out mice were more vulnerable to MDMA-induced toxicity to DA neurons than corresponding wild-type mice. Stimulation of endogenous expression of MT protein with zinc acetate conferred complete protection against MDMA-induced toxicity to DA neurons, and administration of exogenous MT protein afforded partial protection. Collectively, these results indicate that MDMA-induced toxicity to DA neurons is associated with increased Mt1 and Mt2 gene transcription and translation, possibly as part of a neuroprotective mechanism. The present findings may have therapeutic implications for neuropathological conditions involving DA neurons.
3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and 3,4-methyl-enedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) are widely abused amphetamine derivatives that target the serotonin system. The serotonergic neurotoxicity of MDA and MDMA seems dependent on their systemic metabolism. 5-(Glutathion-S-yl)-alpha-methyldopamine [5-(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA] and 2,5-bis(glutathion-S-yl)-alpha-methyldopamine [2,5-bis(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA], metabolites of MDA and MDMA, are also selective serotonergic neurotoxicants and produce behavioral and neurochemical changes similar to those seen with MDA and MDMA. We now show that 5-(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA and 2,5-bis(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA are more potent than MDA and MDMA (K(i) = 69, 50, 107, and 102 microM, respectively) at inhibiting 5-hy-droxytryptamine (serotonin) transport into SK-N-MC cells transiently transfected with the human serotonin transporter (hSERT). Moreover, 5-(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA and 2,5-bis(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA simultaneously stimulated dopamine (DA) transport into the hSERT-expressing cells, an effect attenuated by fluoxetine, indicating that stimulated DA transport was hSERT-dependent. Finally, 5-(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA and 2,5-bis(GSyl)-alpha-MeDA, and to a lesser extent MDA and MDMA, induced a concentration and time-dependent increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) in both hSERT and human dopamine transporter-transfected cells. Fluoxetine attenuated the increase in ROS generation in hSERT-expressing cells. The results are consistent with the view that the serotonergic neurotoxicity of MDA and MDMA may be mediated by the metabolism-dependent stimulation of DA transport into hSERT-expressing cells and ROS generation by redox active catechol-thioether metabolites and DA.
The amphetamine derivative 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy" is a currently used or abused designer drug and fatalities are frequently encountered in forensic practice. However, the question remains open whether an MDMA blood level can be toxic or even potentially lethal. In order to provide insight in the interpretation of a detected MDMA concentration, the distribution of MDMA and its metabolite 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) in various body fluids and tissues was studied and discussed in two different fatalities. Apart from peripheral blood samples (such as femoral and subclavian blood), various blood samples obtained centrally in the human body and several body fluids (such as vitreous humour) were examined. In addition, various tissues such as cardiac muscle, lungs, liver, kidneys, and brain lobes were analysed. In contrast to the peripheral blood levels, high MDMA and MDA levels were found in cardiac blood and the majority of the organs, except for the abdominal adipose tissue. The high concentrations observed in all lung lobes, the liver and stomach contents indicate that post-mortem redistribution of MDMA and MDA into cardiac blood can occur and, as a result, blood sampled centrally in the body should be avoided. Therefore, our data confirm that peripheral blood sampling remains "the golden standard". In addition, a distinct difference in peripheral blood MDMA concentrations in our two overdose cases was established (namely 0.271 and 13.508 microg/ml, respectively). Furthermore, our results suggest that, if a peripheral blood sample is not available and when putrefaction is not too pronounced, vitreous humour and iliopsoas muscle can be valuable specimens for toxicological analysis. Finally, referring to the various mechanisms of death following amphetamine intake, which can result in different survival times (e.g. cardiopulmonary complications versus hyperthermia), the anatomo-pathological findings and the toxicological results should be considered as a whole in arriving at a conclusion.