Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2386309

[ISA--Information System Anesthesia. Decision support by a computer-based information system].

C L Zapf·G Martens
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

"ISA"-Information System Anesthesia-will support the anesthesiologist by presenting information concerning the anesthesia approach. In addition to computing patient data (monitoring), there are three special fields where computers are used in anesthesia: (1) simulation systems for anesthesia training (preventing critical incidents); (2) critiquing systems to comment on the planned anesthesia decisions; and (3) reference systems for rapid information gathering. Simulation and critiquing systems are mainly useful for personal training. Reference systems present information concerning the anesthesia problems to aid in decision-making. ISA is a reference system designed to support the decision process for neurosurgical operations; a new method of presenting information by personal computer in the surgical working area. For each neurosurgical operation there is a graduation of condensed and detailed information with the option of also obtaining general anesthesia knowledge.

Explore related subjects

AnesthesiologyDecision Making, Computer-AssistedGermany, WestHumansInformation SystemsEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Zapf, G Martens. 1990. [ISA--Information System Anesthesia. Decision support by a computer-based information system].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2386309/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗