Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2378071

Motion segregation from speed differences: evidence for nonlinear processing.

Abstract

This paper examines observers' ability to detect regions delimited by speed differences. Several types of translational motion stimuli, of varying task difficulty, were tested over a wide range of base speeds. The observer's task was to decide whether a region of dots moving at a different speed from the base speed was located to the left or right of the display's center. Both increments (dots within the test region moving faster than the base speed) and decrements (dots within the test region moving slower than the base speed) were examined. When the task was relatively difficult the following asymmetries were found: at slow base speeds, incremental thresholds were lower than decremental thresholds; at fast base speeds, the reverse pattern occurred. When the task was relatively easy, no consistent asymmetries were found. It is proposed that the visual system encodes speed through a sigmoidal nonlinear response function, and it is shown that this one nonlinearity can be used to explain results for both easy and difficult tasks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Sekuler. 1990. Motion segregation from speed differences: evidence for nonlinear processing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90104-s

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Direct evidence for the existence of energy-based texture mechanisms.

Two classes of models have been proposed to explain how the visual system processes texture modulations. In 'feature models', abstract representations of the featural properties of local texture regions (eg orientation, spatial frequency, contrast) are first generated, after which differences in individual feature properties across space are detected. In 'energy models', on the other hand, differences across space in the response energies of linear simple-cell-like filters are detected. This model thus processes the existing differences between texture regions directly without generating a full representation of the individual texture regions. We provide here direct evidence for the existence of the second, energy model, using an adaptation paradigm in conjunction with textures simultaneously modulated in two dimensions--orientation and spatial frequency. We found that the mechanism that processed the conjoint modulation was tuned to orientations and spatial frequencies that could not be predicted by any feature model, but which were precisely predicted by the energy model.

Differential Threshold↗