Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2357126

Certification in nephrology: credentialing issues.

Abstract

Credentialing with certification does not ensure pay raises or well-known initials, but it does verify personal knowledge and skills needed to practice in a specialty area. This documentation of special knowledge is a starting point for nursing to take control of its practice and for its members to become autonomous and collaborative practitioners. Unification and standardization of the present system will only bring more power and prestige to the credentials. Documenting quality patient care delivered by certified nephrology nurses is the next step in the nephrology field. Lastly, nurses need to unite and support each other during the certification process as it evolves into a well-respected institution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M E Carlson. 1990. Certification in nephrology: credentialing issues.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2357126/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗