Small-sample reproducibility estimates: an example using rebreathing measurements.

Abstract

We developed a statistical technique to estimate the reproducibility of a parameter from a population in which only two repeated measurements can be made in a single individual. The following data were analyzed: acetylene cardiac output (Qc), lung tissue volume (Vti), and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) measured by rebreathing techniques in a population of 86 healthy subjects (51 men and 35 women). Each subject was measured twice with a computerized rebreathing system using a test gas of 10% He-0.3% C18O-0.7% C2H2-25% O2-balance N2 while sitting at rest. The estimated coefficients of variation for repeated measurements were 6.8, 10.3, and 5.7% for Qc, Vti, and DLCO, respectively. Chebyshev's inequality was used to estimate the imprecision for a single measurement of these parameters and for averages of two or more repeated values. A single measurement of Qc would be within 14.2% of a "true" mean 90% of the time, whereas an average of three consecutive measurements would be within 8.2% of the true mean 90% of the time. Single measurements of Vti and DLCO were found to be within 21.7 and 12.0%, respectively, of the true mean 90% of the time. When three consecutive measurements are averaged, Vti is within 12.6% and DLCO is within 6.9% of the true mean 90% of the time. We conclude that 1) rebreathing Qc is as reproducible as other measurements of cardiac output, 2) rebreathing measurements of DLCO are as reproducible as those made by the single-breath technique, and 3) an average of two to three measurements of Vti should be made to obtain values with a reasonable degree of precision.