Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2252515

Rural practice modes.

Abstract

Solo practice is the dominant mode of rural medical care delivery. At the same time, it is the most likely not to succeed, because the solo physician is choosing to leave the rural community. Group family practice is the most stable form of rural practice, is acceptable, and is sought by the majority of family practice residents seeking to establish new practices. Characteristics of successful rural practices include group practice, retention of the same health care providers for more than three years, a community-oriented focus, integration of non-M.D. health care providers, and a commitment to education within the practice. Academic medical centers with area health education centers (AHECs) should consider developing expanded AHECs to provide the education, planning, consultation, and expertise now needed by rural communities. Academic medical centers without AHECs should consider creating offices of rural health to provide the education, planning, consultation, and expertise needed in rural communities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Holden. 1990. Rural practice modes.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199012000-00032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The impact of micro health insurance on Rwandan health centre costs.

While the implications of payment mechanisms for provider behaviour and cost have been amply explored in industrialized countries, there is little empirical evidence from developing countries. This study exploits the opportunities created by a pilot study of micro health insurance with capitation in Rwanda to address this issue. Using cross-sectional data collected in 52 health centres, the paper employs an econometric cost function with payer-specific outputs to assess the cost impact of two provider payment mechanisms: (1) user fees for care paid by the uninsured, and (2) capitation payment paid by informal insurance schemes for the insured. The cost function allows payer-specific marginal and average costs and scale measures to be calculated. Findings point to significant differences in cost between the two payment forms. These may be due to the incentives embodied in the capitation provider payment or the less severe case-mix among insured patients arising from improved access to care for this group, or both. For both payment types there are important short-run economies of scale, which could be exploited through more intensive use of idle resources in health centres.

Community Health Centers↗