Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2246997

Antismoking products.

Abstract

Nicotine is the addictive substance in tobacco and its withdrawal is responsible for a range of unpleasant symptoms after smoking cessation. Although it produces acute physiological effects, nicotine alone is not carcinogenic and does not appear to cause the vascular disease associated with smoking. Nicotine replacement has been shown to be a safe and effective pharmacological treatment for tobacco dependence in certain smokers. Its efficacy is greatest when prescribed for those who are motivated and highly nicotine-dependent. It is probably not indicated for smokers with a low degree of nicotine dependence. Studies of nicotine chewing gum conducted in special referral clinics have generally produced positive results, whereas those conducted in community practice settings have shown a smaller benefit when compared with placebo. When the results of all published placebo-controlled trials are pooled the typical improvement in smoking cessation rate is 40% (odds ratio continued smoking 0.6; 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.71; P less than 0.00001). The best results with nicotine chewing gum have been obtained with multicomponent programmes which have included some counselling and ongoing follow up and support. Early reports of success with a transdermal nicotine preparation suggest that it may have similar efficacy to nicotine gum. Clonidine administered orally or transdermally has also been shown to reduce tobacco withdrawal symptoms but requires more convincing evidence of long-term efficacy before it can be recommended for routine use. Currently available over-the-counter products, apart from nicotine chewing gum, have not been shown to be effective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S G Gourlay, J J McNeil. Antismoking products.. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb126327.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Big red gum.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chewing Gum↗

Gum chewing reduces ileus after elective open sigmoid colectomy.

HYPOTHESIS: Gum chewing after elective open colon resection may stimulate bowel motility and decrease duration of postoperative ileus. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized study in a community-based teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients undergoing elective open sigmoid resections for recurrent diverticulitis or cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First feelings of hunger, time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, length of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were randomized into 2 groups: a gum-chewing group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 17). The patients in the gum-chewing group chewed sugarless gum 3 times daily for 1 hour each time until discharge. Patient demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative care were equivalent between the 2 groups. All gum-chewing patients tolerated the gum. The first passage of flatus occurred on postoperative hour 65.4 in the gum-chewing group and on hour 80.2 in the control group (P = .05). The first bowel movement occurred on postoperative hour 63.2 in the gum-chewing group and on hour 89.4 in the control group (P = .04). The first feelings of hunger were felt on postoperative hour 63.5 in the gum-chewing group and on hour 72.8 in the control group (P = .27). There were no major complications in either group. The total length of hospital stay was shorter in the gum-chewing group (day 4.3) than in the control group (day 6.8), (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Gum chewing speeds recovery after elective open sigmoid resection by stimulating bowel motility. Gum chewing is an inexpensive and helpful adjunct to postoperative care after colectomy.

Chewing Gum↗