Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2205426

Multiple pregnancy.

Abstract

Most multiple pregnancies are diagnosed, but early diagnosis still presents some problems. Congenital malformation is commoner in multiple pregnancies, usually without concordance, which complicates decisions about pregnancy termination. Because of the higher perinatal mortality rates, women with multiple pregnancies should be offered extra antenatal care, with the specific objectives of early diagnosis and timely treatment of pre-eclampsia, preterm labour and growth retardation. If growth retardation affects only one fetus, intervention must be carefully judged. Measures such as bedrest, fetal monitoring and elective operative delivery are reviewed, and no evidence of benefit is found from their routine use. However, such interventions are valuable in selected cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Campbell. 1990. Multiple pregnancy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80215-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗