Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2201348

Cerebral autoregulation.

Abstract

Autoregulation of blood flow denotes the intrinsic ability of an organ or a vascular bed to maintain a constant perfusion in the face of blood pressure changes. Alternatively, autoregulation can be defined in terms of vascular resistance changes or simply arteriolar caliber changes as blood pressure or perfusion pressure varies. While known in almost any vascular bed, autoregulation and its disturbance by disease has attracted particular attention in the cerebrovascular field. The basic mechanism of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is controversial. Most likely, the autoregulatory vessel caliber changes are mediated by an interplay between myogenic and metabolic mechanisms. Influence of perivascular nerves and most recently the vascular endothelium has also been the subject of intense investigation. CBF autoregulation typically operates between mean blood pressures of the order of 60 and 150 mm Hg. These limits are not entirely fixed but can be modulated by sympathetic nervous activity, the vascular renin-angiotensin system, and any factor (notably changes in arterial carbon dioxide tension) that decreases or increases CBF. Disease states of the brain may impair or abolish CBF autoregulation. Thus, autoregulation is lost in severe head injury or acute ischemic stroke, leaving surviving brain tissue unprotected against the potentially harmful effect of blood pressure changes. Likewise, autoregulation may be lost in the surroundings of a space-occupying brain lesion, be it a tumor or a hematoma. In many such disease states, autoregulation may be regained by hyperventilatory hypocapnia. Autoregulation may also be impaired in neonatal brain asphyxia and infections of the central nervous system, but appears to be intact in spreading depression and migraine, despite impairment of chemical and metabolic control of CBF. In chronic hypertension, the limits of autoregulation are shifted toward high blood pressure. Acute hypertensive encephalopathy, on the other hand, is thought to be due to autoregulatory failure at very high pressure. In long-term diabetes mellitus there may be chronic impairment of CBF autoregulation, probably due to diabetic microangiopathy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O B Paulson, S Strandgaard, L Edvinsson. 1990. Cerebral autoregulation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2201348/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeted prefrontal cortical activation with bifrontal ECT.

The anatomical brain regions involved in the therapeutic and adverse actions of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are unknown. Previous studies suggest that bifrontal vs. bitemporal ECT differ in therapeutic efficacy and cognitive side effects. We therefore performed cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging during bitemporal vs. bifrontal ECT-induced seizures to identify regions crucial for the differences between these treatments. Patients with major depression, undergoing bitemporal or bifrontal ECT, were studied. Ictal-interictal SPECT images were analyzed with statistical parametric mapping for bitemporal (n=11 image pairs in 8 patients) and bifrontal (n=4 image pairs in 2 patients) ECT-induced seizures to identify regions of ictal CBF changes. Bifrontal ECT was found to cause increases in CBF in prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions. Bitemporal ECT, however, caused CBF increases in the lateral frontal cortex and in the anterior temporal lobes. In bifrontal ECT, a greater increase in prefrontal activation, while sparing the temporal lobes, may result in a better therapeutic response and fewer adverse effects on memory than bitemporal ECT.

Cerebrovascular Circulation↗