Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2139310

Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk.

Abstract

Low back pain is common, but a herniated intervertebral disk is the cause in only a small percentage of cases. Most symptomatic disk herniations result in clinical manifestations (pain, reflex loss, muscle weakness) that resolve with conservative therapy, and only 5% to 10% of patients require surgery. Sciatica is usually the first clue to disk herniation, but sciatica may be mimicked by other disorders that cause radiating pain. Because more than 95% of lumbar disk herniations occur at the L4-5 or L5-S1 levels, the physical examination should focus on abnormalities of the L5 and S1 nerve roots. Plain radiography is not useful in diagnosing disk herniation, but more sophisticated imaging (myelography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) should generally be delayed until a patient is clearly a surgical candidate. Conservative therapy includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, brief bed rest (often for less than 1 week), early progressive ambulation, and reassurance about a favorable prognosis. Muscle relaxants and narcotic analgesics have a limited role, and their use should be strictly time-limited. Conventional traction and corsets are probably ineffective. Except for patients with the cauda equina syndrome, surgery is generally appropriate only when there is a combination of definite disk herniation shown by imaging, a corresponding syndrome of sciatic pain, a corresponding neurologic deficit, and a failure to respond to 6 weeks of conservative therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Deyo, J D Loeser, S J Bigos. 1990-04-15. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk.. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-598

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Crazy again!].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Back Pain

Percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage for pyogenic spondylitis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of results in 23 cases of early-stage pyogenic spondylitis treated with percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage as a treatment method for early-stage pyogenic spondylitis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional surgical treatment for pyogenic spondylitis has the disadvantage of increased morbidity caused by the extensive exposure required in the presence of infection. Recently, a few case reports have described minimally invasive treatment for pyogenic spondylitis in which percutaneous suction aspiration was used. However, the efficacy of this new treatment has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: All charts, radiographs, and bacteriologic and histologic findings were reviewed. All 23 patients who received the new treatment were observed clinically and radiographically, to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. RESULTS: To date, all patients have been observed for more than 2 years. Twenty (87%) of the 23 patients have shown good results according to the evaluation. The causative organism was identified using tissue culturing in 12 (52%) of the 23 patients. The causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus in 8, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Propionibacterium acnes in 1 each. Back pain as the major symptom in these patients was relieved within an average of 9.4 days after the operation. However, the patient in whom the spondylitis was caused by Candida albicans has received this new treatment twice without success. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of percutaneous suction aspiration with drainage shows that it is an effective treatment for early-stage pyogenic spondylitis.

Back Pain