PubMed · 2129720
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Alvarez, L Sáenz, C Oliveras, F Sánchez. 1990. [Heart block].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2129720/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of bundle-branch reentry ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT) by the standard approach is challenging, and this may lead to nonrecognition of this tachycardia mechanism. Because the postpacing interval (PPI) after entrainment has been correlated with the distance from the pacing site to the reentrant circuit, BBR-VT entrainment by pacing from the right ventricular apex (RVA) should result in a PPI similar to the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). This factor may differentiate BBR-VT from other mechanisms of wide-QRS-complex tachycardia with AV dissociation, such as myocardial reentrant VT (MR-VT) or AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), in which the circuit is usually located away from the RVA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transient entrainment by RVA pacing was attempted in 18 consecutive BBR-VTs and finally achieved in 13. Results were compared with those found in 59 consecutive MR-VTs and 50 consecutive AVNRTs. The mean PPI-TCL difference was significantly (P:<0.0001) shorter in the BBR-VT group (9+/-11 ms) than in the MR-VT (109+/-48 ms) and the AVNRT (150+/-29 ms) groups. No BBR-VT showed a PPI-TCL >30 ms (range -12 to 24 ms). Except for 2 MR-VTs, no MR-VT (range 21 to 211 ms) or AVNRT (range 100 to 215 ms) showed a PPI-TCL <30 ms. CONCLUSIONS: A PPI-TCL >30 ms, after entrainment by RVA stimulation, makes BBR-VT unlikely. Conversely, a PPI-TCL <30 ms is suggestive of BBR-VT but should lead to further investigation by use of conventional criteria.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dual-chamber pacing improved hemodynamics acutely in a subset of patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction but conveyed no long-term symptomatic benefit in most. More recently, LV pacing and biventricular (multisite) pacing have been used to improve systolic contractility by altering the electrical and mechanical ventricular activation sequence in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction delay or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Intraventricular conduction delay and LBBB cause dyssynchronous right ventricular and LV contraction and worsen LV dysfunction in cardiomyopathies. Both LV and biventricular cardiac pacing are thought to improve cardiac function in this situation by effecting a more coordinated and efficient ventricular contraction. Short-term hemodynamic studies have shown improvement in LV systolic function, which seems more pronounced with monoventricular LV pacing than with biventricular pacing. Recent clinical studies in limited numbers of patients suggest long-term clinical benefit of biventricular pacing in patients with severe CHF symptoms. Continuing and future studies will demonstrate whether and in which patients LV and biventricular pacing are permanently effective and equivalent and which pacing site within the LV produces the most beneficial hemodynamic results.