Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2093016

Clinical development programme for omeprazole.

Abstract

Omeprazole has been shown to provide more rapid symptom relief and to heal ulcers more quickly and reliably than H2-receptor antagonists in duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. In addition, omeprazole is well tolerated and has a good safety profile. Among the areas for clinical development with omeprazole are the maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer, treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-induced gastro-duodenal lesions, maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis and the treatment of bleeding ulcer. Two studies of patients with duodenal ulcer have shown that maintenance treatment with omeprazole, 10 mg once daily, was as effective as, or superior to, treatment with omeprazole, 20 mg given on Friday, Saturday and Sunday only, and markedly superior to placebo. In patients with gastric ulcer which developed during treatment with NSAIDs omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, resulted in a higher healing rate than ranitidine, 150 mg b.i.d., both at 4 and at 8 weeks. Reflux oesophagitis is often a persistent condition requiring continuous maintenance treatment. In a recent multicentre trial, a substantially higher proportion of patients remained in remission with omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, than with ranitidine, 150 mg b.i.d. Studies comparing omeprazole and ranitidine (administered intravenously) in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers have also demonstrated the superiority of omeprazole with regard to the control of bleeding and the avoidance of surgery. Further studies are currently underway in this and other related areas.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Walan. 1990. Clinical development programme for omeprazole.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000200518

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hormone replacement therapy: the benefits in tailoring the regimen and dose.

Despite the clear benefits of long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT), the majority of patients tend to undergo short-term treatment. The cyclical bleedings induced by the sequential progestogen administration are often unacceptable namely in the elderly postmenopausal women. At the standard doses HRT preparations can also induce annoying hormone-related side effects, both in sequential and continuous combined regimens. Lower HRT schedules are reported to be highly effective in the relief of climacteric symptoms, inducing minimal endometrial stimulation with high rates of amenorrhea. Continuous administration of low doses of progestins is safe for endometrium protection and minimizes progestin-related side effects. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that low dose HRT can prevent the increase in bone turnover and the consequent bone loss in postmenopausal women. The choice of lower HRT dosages can also be useful for the number of potential disadvantages of standard HRT doses, mainly for long-term treatments. Low dose regimens should be considered as a starting dose to minimize the occurrence of side effects, improving compliance and, therefore, HRT effects on the prevention of long-term consequences of estrogen deprivation.

Drug Administration Schedule↗

Ultrasonographic endometrial monitoring during continuous-sequential hormonal replacement therapy regimen in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the endometrial thickness in different periods of a continuous-sequential HRT regimen and to correlate the ultrasonographic findings with the histological patterns. METHODS: The study was structured in two phases. In the 1st phase, 37 postmenopausal women (group A) treated by at least 6 months with a conventional continuous-sequential hormonal replacement therapy (cs-HRT) regimen were enrolled. In all patients, the endometrial thickness was measured at the 7th, 14th, 21st and 25th day of the cycle using transvaginal ultrasonography (TV-USG). In the 2nd phase of the study, other 41 postmenopausal women (group B) were enrolled and treated with the same sc-HRT regimen. At entry and after six cycles of cs-HRT, an endometrial biopsy was performed. The endometrial pattern was related with endometrial thickness. Either the evaluations were performed immediately after progestogen withdrawal bleeding, as showed by 1st phase results. RESULTS: The results of the 1st phase of the study showed a mean endometrial thickness significantly lower at 7th day of the cycle compared to 14th, 21st and 25th day (4.3+/-1.2 versus 6.6+/-2.9, 7.8+/-4.2 and 7.4+/-4.6 mm+/-SD, respectively). After six cycles of cs-HRT (2nd phase of the study), the mean endometrial thickness was significantly increased in comparison with basal values (4.2+/-1.5 versus 2.8+/-1.2 mm+/-SD; P<0.05). Endometrial biopsies showed 13 cases (39.4%) of atrophy and 20 cases (60.6%) of proliferative endometrium. Mean endometrial thickness in case of atrophy was lower than in presence of a proliferative endometrium (3.7+/-1.2 versus 4.4+/-1.4 mm+/-SD; not significant). Endometrial thickness was <4 mm in 16 cases (11 of atrophic and five of proliferative endometrium), between 4 and 5 mm in 15 cases (13 of proliferative and two of atrophic endometrium) and between 5 and 6 mm in two cases (either case of proliferative endometrium). CONCLUSIONS: The best timing for monitoring endometrial thickness during cs-HRT regimens is the period immediately after withdrawal bleeding improving the reliability of the ultrasonographic exam to identify endometrial pathologies.

Drug Administration Schedule↗

Methadone maintenance.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Administration Schedule↗