Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2071327

Nursing science--does it make a difference?

K Lerheim
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have myriad questions about nursing. We also have opinions and assumptions as to the true answers, but generally lack evidence or documentation to support these answers. My topic is a question, and I shall ask other questions related to the topic. To some I propose answers that can be documented. I do not argue that these are the final answers. I claim the right to come up with new answers, next week or next year.

Explore related subjects

Diffusion of InnovationHumansNorwayNursing Evaluation ResearchNursing ResearchNursing ServicesNursing TheoryResearch DesignScienceSocial ValuesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Lerheim. Nursing science--does it make a difference?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2071327/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Work redesign calls for new pay and performance plans.

TQM/CQI and patient-centered care initiatives are also spurring changes in hospitals' employee payment and performance systems. The tricky part is that those systems have to change at the same time delivery systems are changing. "We feel we can't first develop new care delivery systems and then spend the next two years adjusting compensation systems," says one executive.

Diffusion of Innovation↗
PubMed1992

Data sharing and evaluation.

Interinstitutional evaluations of molecular markers for the diagnosis and staging of cancer are highly dependent on strict standardization of assays to make clinical comparisons valid. New assays for cancer markers depend on discoveries of biochemical or cellular functions coupled with technologies suitable for making relevant measurements. Transfer of these technologies from the research laboratory to the diagnostic laboratory requires method validation that consists of specific information regarding assay principle, reagents, calibration, sensitivity, assay behavior, specimen requirements, clinical and method correlations, reference range, quality control, proficiency testing, critical steps, and guidelines for interpretation. Fulfillment of all the components of method validation will guarantee the fastest and most accurate implementation of new diagnostic assays in clinical studies and practice.

Diffusion of Innovation↗