Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2067694

[Ambulatory manometry].

Abstract

Dynamic manometry is a new technique which allows an esophageal or gastrointestinal motility recording by means of a portable recorder for a period of 24 hours. It consists of a probe with microtransducers to pick up the pressure variations of the gut lumen and a portable recorder where the pressure signals are amplified and are recorded in analogic or digital form. At the end of the examination the manometric data are transferred in the memory of a computer which afterwards provides analysis, visualization and printing of the tracing. In some system the pressure parameters are automatically calculated (mean frequency, amplitude, duration and propagation of waves, Motility Index, ect) for each period of observation (interdigestive and digestive, diurnal and nocturnal, etc). The ideal equipment, unfortunately, is not available at the moment and some of those commercially available may have particular advantages that others do not and vice versa. In this respect some economic and technical considerations should be made, ranging from their high cost to the vulnerability of some of their components, difficulty in recording the sphincter activity, unreliability incompleteness or excessive complexity of some software etc. However, the main difference of dynamic against stationary manometry consists of the fact that gut motor activity is recorded in a patient not lying in a hospital bed but during the normal life activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Bortolotti. 1991-04-15. [Ambulatory manometry].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2067694/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Occupational issues in episodic care populations.

BACKGROUND: Much care for non-emergency problems is provided at "episodic care" settings (e.g., urgent care and emergency room). METHODS: Ninety-four subjects, without known occupational disease, who were seeking care for a chronic or sub-acute problem in an episodic care location, were interviewed to assess the frequency and types of occupational health concerns. They were asked whether work probably "caused" or "made worse" their illness and whether their illness "made work difficult." RESULTS: Categorized hierarchically, 20% reported causation, 15% worsening, and 15% interference of illness with work. (Each was categorized in one category only). Only 50% reported absence of a workplace-health interaction. One-third reported that workplace changes could improve their functional status. Nevertheless, workplace factors were discussed only 21% of the time in physician-patient encounters. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that occupational health issues are frequent in episodic care settings and that the definition of occupational health issues should be broadened to include "made worse" and "illness makes work difficult" as well as the traditional workplace causation definition. Further, episodic care settings present unique opportunities for prevention.

Ambulatory Care↗