Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2049361

Changes in oxygen saturation using two different sedation techniques.

Abstract

Pulse oximetry was used to assess the degree of hypoxia observed in patients receiving simple midazolam sedation for removal of lower third molars and compared to that seen in patients receiving a combination sedation technique using nalbuphine and midazolam. Results showed that the degree of hypoxia experienced by patients receiving the combination technique was significantly more profound in both incidence and depth than that seen in the group receiving midazolam alone (p less than 0.05).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G M Walton, C A Boyle, P J Thomson. 1991. Changes in oxygen saturation using two different sedation techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(91)90087-l

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The development of a pediatric radiology sedation program.

BACKGROUND: An increase in the number of patients undergoing sedation for imaging procedures has led to many changes in practice over the past 10 years. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate sedation practice changes in a pediatric radiology department during the last 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiology computer database and corresponding minutes of the Radiology Sedation Committee were reviewed to identify changes in sedation policy. Data from three blocks of time were analyzed to determine time to sedation, time to discharge, drug frequency, rates of adverse events, sedation failure, and paradoxical reaction. RESULTS: Specific practice changes undertaken over the 5-year period include: (1) increased speed of administration of IV pentobarbital, (2) alternating pentobarbital and fentanyl, (3) presedation with midazolam, and (4) administering oral pentobarbital to children under and (5) over 12 months of age. Based on data analysis, changes 1 and 4 were incorporated into the sedation policy, while changes 2, 3, and 5 were abandoned. Comparison of data from the three time segments revealed improvement in the time to sedation, sedation failure, adverse event, and paradoxical reaction rates. CONCLUSION: There is improvement in all aspects of patient outcomes with sedation, as a result of several changes in sedation practice.

Procedural Sedation↗

[Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?].

INTRODUCTION: The most proper examination for the morphological changes of the upper gastrointestinal tract is endoscopy. The standard oro-gastric route is carried out under conscious sedation, but the drugs used might have cardiopulmonary side effects. Furthermore there are a few conditions when this routine endoscopy is technically impossible. AIMS: Could these failures be avoided with an endoscope led through the nose? Are there advantages of the use of ultrathin endoscopes for transnasal oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy? PATIENTS/METHODS: Own experiences with transnasal therapeutic endoscopies on patients with cancer in the head and neck region compared with data from the literature. RESULTS: Based on literature and on own experiences, transnasal oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy may be advised in cases with trismus, stenosis of the upper aero-digestive tract, oropharyngeal dysphagia, cricopharyngeal achalasia, in several neurosurgical conditions and on severely ill ventilated patients. I.v. premedication is not always necessary for transnasal oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy done with ultrathin endoscopes. CONCLUSIONS: The oesophagus might be accessed also via the nose, but it must be emphasized that transnasal oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is only advised when the standard way of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy is impossible.

Procedural Sedation↗