Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2033399

Transient ischemic attacks: an update.

Abstract

This is a review of extant concepts of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), their definitions, prognostic significance, pathogenesis, physiology, and management. The natural history of TIAs depends upon the risk factors of the population group studied, so that therapeutic trials should be controlled and randomized and not dependent upon published natural history data. A strong association between TIAs and coronary artery disease has now been established. It may be difficult to establish the cause or pathogenesis of TIAs in any given patient in view of the relatively poor correlation between the patient's symptoms and location of arterial plaques. Recent studies have suggested mechanisms aside from impaired perfusion or embolization from carotid plaques or vertebral basilar disease. There are no proven indications for carotid endarterectomy, a procedure which has been excessively used in the United States, but presently ongoing prospective, randomized, controlled multi-center studies will likely resolve this important issue. Neither is there scientific validation for the use of long-term anticoagulants, but data support the efficacy of ASA in reducing the incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with TIAs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Scheinberg. 1991. Transient ischemic attacks: an update.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(91)90037-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Economic analysis of low-dose heparin vs the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin are effective strategies for preventing venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery. The economic attractiveness of these 2 strategies in North America is unknown. We conducted an economic analysis of low-dose heparin calcium compared with enoxaparin sodium, a low-molecular-weight heparin, for thromboembolism prophylaxis after colorectal surgery. METHODS: We used decision analysis, with an economic perspective of a third-party payer. Efficacy data were obtained from the Canadian Multicentre Colorectal Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis Trial and a literature review. Canadian costs for diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major bleeding were obtained from chart review and a national hospital database of colorectal surgery; American costs were obtained from published literature. The main outcomes were incremental benefits (symptomatic DVTs, symptomatic PEs, and major bleeding events avoided) and incremental costs for every 1000 patients treated. RESULTS: In the Canadian Colorectal Trial, the relative risk of DVT and PE for enoxaparin compared with low-dose heparin was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.5), and the relative risk of major bleeding was 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.9). With the use of these data in the baseline analysis, a strategy of enoxaparin prophylaxis was associated with equal numbers of symptomatic DVTs and PEs, and an excess of 12 major bleeding episodes for every 1000 patients treated, with an additional cost of $86 050 (Canadian data) or $145 667 (US data). In a sensitivity analysis using optimal assumptions for efficacy and safety of enoxaparin (relative risk of DVT, 0.8; relative risk of PE, 0.4; relative risk of major bleeding, 1.0), a strategy of enoxaparin prophylaxis was associated with 0.8 fewer symptomatic DVT, 3 fewer symptomatic PEs, and equal numbers of major bleeding episodes for every 1000 patients treated, with an additional cost of $15 217 (Canadian data) or $107 614 (US data). CONCLUSION: Although heparin and enoxaparin are equally effective, low-dose heparin is a more economically attractive choice for thromboembolism prophylaxis after colorectal surgery.

Anticoagulants