Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2001664

Anxiety.

Abstract

The general principles useful in approaching most psychiatric emergencies are equally applicable to the handling of the anxious patient. Establish rapid contact because anxious patients should not be left waiting. Expedite talking to reduce tension because putting thoughts and emotions into words invariably reduces initial tension. Make a quick first assessment of the anxious patient's general appearance, level of consciousness, level of tension, and leading affect or mood. Choose a private and relaxed setting for the interview if possible. Allow for a slow final evaluation because many initially overwhelmed anxious people may reconstitute within a matter of hours when allowed to talk, rest, or even sleep. Take the anxious patient's chief complaint seriously. A brief physical examination should be performed routinely in almost all cases, especially when there is a physical complaint. Every attempt should be made to rule out an organic etiology for the anxiety. Listening is an active but demanding process. Most of the time it means sitting down and giving all of one's attention to the patient, even if it is for just a few minutes. What patients find most comforting is the feeling of being understood. The emergency medicine physician should be careful to avoid a judgmental or punitive approach. Every attempt should be made to engage the family in caring for the patient while in the Emergency Department. It is equally important to recognize that relatives and friends may need assistance to help cope with the anxious patient once discharged. The emergency medicine physician needs to assess the degree of social support available in the patient's environment because a sensible disposition will depend on it.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E E Kercher. 1991. Anxiety.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2001664/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Event-related potential evidence for the processing efficiency theory.

The purpose of this study was to examine the central tenets of the processing efficiency theory using psychophysiological measures of attention and effort. Twenty-eight participants were divided equally into either a high or low trait anxiety group. They were then required to perform a simulated driving task while responding to one of four target light-emitting diodes. Cortical activity and dual task performance were recorded under two conditions -- baseline and competition -- with cognitive anxiety being elevated in the competitive session by an instructional set. Although driving speed was similar across sessions, a reduction in P3 amplitude to cue onset in the light detection task occurred for both groups during the competitive session, suggesting a reduction in processing efficiency as participants became more state anxious. Our findings provide more comprehensive and mechanistic evidence for processing efficiency theory, and confirm that increases in cognitive anxiety can result in a reduction of processing efficiency with little change in performance effectiveness.

Anxiety↗

Brief report: testing the factorial invariance of the CBCL Somatic Complaints scale as a measure of internalizing symptoms for children with and without chronic illness.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factorial invariance of the Somatic Complaints subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of Internalizing Behavior Problems across a sample of children with and without spina bifida. METHODS: Multisample confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare mother and father report on the Somatic Complaints subscale across a sample of children with spina bifida and a matched comparison sample of able-bodied children ages 8 through 11 years (N = 68 for mother report in each group; N = 54 for father report in the spina bifida group and 53 for the able-bodied group). RESULTS: Although there were no significant between-group differences in the magnitude of factor loadings, significantly more variance in scores on the Somatic Complaints scale was unrelated to Internalizing Behavior Problems for the spina bifida group, compared to the able-bodied group. There were no between-group differences when father data were analyzed, but the latent variable of Internalizing Behavior Problems explained little variance in the Somatic Complaints scale for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal report of Somatic Complaints on the CBCL does not appear to measure Internalizing Behavior Problems in the same manner across groups of children with and without spina bifida. This suggests that the Somatic Complaints subscale should be interpreted with caution when measuring Internalizing Behavior Problems within this population.

Anxiety↗