Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1995699

Carpal orientation from computed reference axes.

Abstract

Carpal instability is usually diagnosed by abnormal two-plane radiographic angles. These angles are often unreliable. A method that eliminates interpretation of overlapping shadows and uses all of the carpal geometry should improve clinical diagnoses. The digital data from computed tomography scans can be manipulated to describe the carpal orientation in the normal wrist. The digital data from the computed tomography scans of twenty-two normal wrists were used to compute distances with and without directions between the volumetric centroids of the carpal bones. An expansion technique also extracted from the computed tomography data an orthogonal set of vectors, the principal axes. The first principal axis describes the longest dimension of each bone. The average angle produced by the first principal axes of the scaphoid and lunate was 23.6 degrees, scaphoid and capitate was 73.2 degrees, and the capitate and the lunate was 93.5 degrees. These computations represent new carpal axes and intercarpal angles that are not related to the commonly measured two-plane radiographic angles. They should prove helpful in the study of kinematics and pathomechanics in the wrist joint.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Belsole, D R Hilbelink, J A Llewellyn, M Dale, J A Ogden. 1991. Carpal orientation from computed reference axes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(10)80018-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Carpal anomalies.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Carpal Bones↗

Diagnostic strategy for suspected scaphoid fractures in the presence of other fractures in the carpal region.

Bone scintigraphy will identify up to 25% of occult scaphoid bone fractures after negative scaphoid X-rays. Consequently, it deserves a place in the diagnostic process of suspected scaphoid fractures. However, the role of bone scintigraphy is less clear if scaphoid X-rays show other fractures in the carpal region. We analysed 111 consecutive patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture on physical examination. Scaphoid X-rays revealed 61 fractures. Fifty-five patients had scaphoid fractures only and six patients had other fractures in the carpal region but no scaphoid fracture. In 50 cases, no bone injury was seen on these X-rays. In three out of the six patients with other fractures in the carpal region, bone scintigraphy revealed four occult concomitant fractures: one scaphoid, one scaphoid and trapezial and one capitate fracture. In conclusion, bone scintigraphy is required when scaphoid X-rays do not confirm a suspected scaphoid fracture, even in the presence of other fractures in the carpal region.

Carpal Bones↗

Intra-individual comparison between open and 2-portal endoscopic release in clinically matched bilateral carpal syndrome.

Based upon bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) we undertook a prospective randomised intra-individual comparison between open (OR) and 2-portal endoscopic release (2-PER) to establish if there is any demonstrable advantage in undertaking either technique in a 1 year follow-up. Ten patients with bilateral CTS were enrolled in this study and underwent a 2-PER on the one and an OR with two minimised incisions on the contralateral hand. Both hands were examined pre- and postoperatively after 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Preoperatively both hands revealed statistically no significant differences in all the parameters recorded. Comparing both techniques no significant differences could be detected in the follow-up period. Nevertheless, both techniques showed significant improvements in the severity of symptoms and pain, in sensory nerve testing and in electro-diagnostic parameters, when comparing pre- with postoperative data after 1 year. The endoscopic approach revealed no distinct advantages over the open technique not only in the late but also in the early postoperative follow-up period when performing intra-individual comparison. Considering the higher complication rate and costs when performing 2-PER the OR with two minimised incisions seems to be a good alternative in order to keep the recovery period as short as possible.

Carpal Bones↗