Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1990724

Ultrasonic phased array controller for hyperthermia applications.

P J Benkeser·T L Pao·Y J Yoon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multiple and mechanically scanned ultrasound transducer systems have demonstrated the efficacy of using ultrasound to produce deep localized hyperthermia. The use of ultrasonic phased arrays has been proposed as an alternative to these systems. A phased array offers a more flexible approach to heating tumours in that the size, shape, and position of its focal region can be altered during the course of treatment in order to achieve the desired temperature distribution. This added flexibility comes at the cost of increased complexity of the hardware necessary to drive the transducer because each element requires its own amplifer with both phase and amplitude control. In order for phased arrays with large numbers of elements to be feasible for hyperthermia applications, the complexity of this circuitry must be minimized. This paper describes a circuit design which simplifies the electronics required to control a phased array transducer system for hyperthermia applications. The design is capable of controlling virtually any type of phased array transducer operating at frequencies less than 2 MHz. The system performance was verified through beam profile measurements using a 48-element tapered phased array transducer.

Explore related subjects

Hyperthermia, InducedUltrasonic TherapyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Benkeser, T L Pao, Y J Yoon. 1991. Ultrasonic phased array controller for hyperthermia applications.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624x(91)90179-c

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Effects of waterbolus size, shape and configuration on the SAR distribution pattern of the Lucite cone applicator.

The effects of waterbolus dimensions and configuration on the effective field size (EFS) of the Lucite cone applicator (LCA) for superficial hyperthermia are presented. The goal of the research is to develop guidelines which mark out a sub-set of optimal LCA-waterbolus set-ups. The effects of variations in (i) waterbolus thickness, (ii) waterbolus area, (iii) waterbolus length/width ratio and (iv) eccentric placement of the applicator have been investigated in an FDTD model study. The prominent effects are verified with IR thermography measurements. An optimal EFS value of 80 cm2 is found for waterbolus area of 200-400 cm2. A small (10 x 10 cm2) waterbolus area restricts the EFS to 25% of the optimal value. The sensitivity to sub-optimal waterbolus area and length/width ratio increases with waterbolus height. Eccentric placement of the LCA near the waterbolus edge reduces the EFS to up to 50% of the optimal value. The IR measurements confirm the model findings. Based on the results, the following guidelines for the clinical application of the LCA have been defined: the waterbolus (i) should extend the LCA aperture at least 2.5 cm, especially at the Lucite windows, and (ii) the height should not exceed 2 cm.

Hyperthermia, Induced↗
PubMed2001

Antenna arrays in the SIGMA-eye applicator: interactions and transforming networks.

OBJECTIVES: In multiantenna applicators such as the SIGMA-60 or SIGMA-Eye, which consist of 4 or 12 pairs of antennas shunt to 4 or 12 amplifiers ("antenna couplets"), phases and amplitudes in the feed points of these antennas under certain conditions can significantly differ from the values selected at the multichannel amplifier (forward parameters), mainly due to coupling. In the SIGMA-Eye, this interaction is particularly affected by the transforming networks between the generators and the feed points, thus hampering the control of the feed point parameters. In this work, we perform measurements at existing applicators, present a formalism to describe the facts numerically, and investigate modifications of the transforming networks to improve the performance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prepared an experimental setup for the SIGMA-Eye applicator that is fed by forward waves of a 12-channel amplifier system. In this setup, we made the water bolus, the interior of the tissue-equivalent phantom, and the entire transforming network accessible for measuring probes. Then, we constructed various alternative transforming networks such as Pawsey loops, LC matching networks, and power dividers and compared them with the original matching network of the SIGMA-Eye applicator. In particular, we utilized a high-resistive probe to determine the disturbances and influences caused by some channels with respect to some selected feed points of the SIGMA-Eye dipoles. RESULTS: In the original SIGMA-Eye applicator, the influences of coupling channels on the phases and voltages in the feed point of a particular antenna are largest for adjacent longitudinal channels. Here, the +/- 10 degrees phase shift and +/- 30% voltage change were observed if the reference channel (i.e., the disturbed channel) and disturbing channel are equally powered. The changes eminently increased to -30 degrees to + 100 degrees phase shift and -80% to +50% voltage change if the reference channel is fed with much lower power (four to eight-fold) than the disturbing channel. The disturbance from distant channels is less but still significant, reaching shifts of -10 degrees to +50 degrees and -50% to +20%, respectively. Using Pawsey loops instead of the original ferrite rings in the SIGMA-Eye network, the efficacy of the baluns was improved by a more than a factor of 4. Using an LC matching network, dependencies on frequency and external arrangements can be reduced significantly. Applying a power divider circuit, the coupling between antennas combined to one channel is considerably diminished (down to <-25 dB). CONCLUSION: Coupling between resonators (pairs of antennas including the matching network) reduces the control of the SIGMA-Eye applicator, i.e., it causes deviations between the selection of forward parameters at the amplifier and the total actual parameters in the feed points of the antennas. Modified transformation networks can improve the control, in particular by reducing sheath currents and asymmetries. There is a linear but variable relationship between selected (amplifiers) and actually given (feed points) parameters. This linear mapping (described by a matrix) and its characteristics need further investigation.

Hyperthermia, Induced↗