Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1961069

[Family planning].

Abstract

According to the fact that a great majority of women have expressed their wish to have only two children, two main questions have arised: what are the means that women use to limit their family size and what are the acceptable measures which the society can undertake to avoid further decline of crude birth rate in order to attain a stable population. Except for Kosovo and Macedonia, namely, in all other parts of Yugoslavia depopulating trends are present. Adequate data about contraceptive prevalence are not available, and according to some partial data, even among the women wanting no additional children, the percent of those planning no use of contraception is as high as 17.3 and further 21.2% are planning to rely on less effective contraceptive methods. The result of this situation is a relatively high number of induced abortions in Croatia 1989: 43227 or 77.7 per 100 live births). To improve this unfavourable situation, medical profession has to promote a wider use of contraception in general, particularly with more effective methods. Unfavoured decline of crude birth rate could be corrected, however, only through complex activities of long duration in order to achieve thorough improvement of the standard of living. With these improved living conditions more women would, most probably, want to have more than two children, thus avoiding the present depopulating trends in some parts of the country. On the other hand, any restriction of legal rights and availability of fertility regulation methods would be fully anachronistic and therefore unacceptable, since the only predictable result would be the increase of illegal abortions with all the well-known health risks and life-threatening conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Randić. [Family planning].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1961069/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

BACKGROUND: Side effects caused by oral contraceptives discourage compliance with, and continuation of, oral contraceptives. A suggested disadvantage of biphasic compared to triphasic oral contraceptive pills is an increase in breakthrough bleeding. We conducted this systematic review to examine this potential disadvantage. OBJECTIVES: To compare biphasic with triphasic oral contraceptives in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation due to side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS and CENTRAL. We searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted the authors of relevant studies and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the USA. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing any biphasic with any triphasic oral contraceptive when used to prevent pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We examined the studies found during the searches for possible inclusion and assessed methodological quality using Cochrane guidelines. We contacted the authors of included studies and of possibly randomized studies for supplemental information about the methods and outcomes. We entered the data into RevMan. We calculated Peto odds ratios for incidence of discontinuation due to medical reasons, intermenstrual bleeding, and absence of withdrawal bleeding. MAIN RESULTS: Only two trials of limited quality met our inclusion criteria. Larranaga 1978 compared two biphasic pills and one triphasic pill, each containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol. No important differences emerged, and the frequency of discontinuation due to medical problems was similar with all three pills. Percival-Smith 1990 compared a biphasic pill containing norethindrone (Ortho 10/11) with a triphasic pill containing levonorgestrel (Triphasil) and with another triphasic containing norethindrone (Ortho 7/7/7). The biphasic pill had inferior cycle control compared with the levonorgestrel triphasic. The odds ratio of cycles with intermenstrual bleeding was 1.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.2) for the biphasic compared with the triphasic levonorgestrel pill. The odds ratio of cycles without withdrawal bleeding was 6.5 (95% CI 3.1 to 13). In contrast, cycle control with the biphasic pill was comparable to that of the triphasic containing the same progestin (norethindrone). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence is limited and the internal validity of these trials is questionable. Given the high losses to follow up, these reports may even be considered observational. Given that caveat, the biphasic pill containing norethindrone was associated with inferior cycle control compared with the triphasic pill containing levonorgestrel. The choice of progestin may be more important than the phasic regimen in determining bleeding patterns.

Contraception↗