Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1869724

Power: a concept analysis.

Abstract

This paper follows the Walker & Avant approach to concept analysis of the concept of power. For the purposes of the paper, power was defined as the actual or potential ability or capacity to achieve objectives through an interpersonal process in which the goals and means to achieve the goals are mutually established and worked toward. The distinction between the views of power as 'power to' versus 'power over' are addressed in the literature review. King's conceptual framework was used as a guide. Defining attributes, antecedents and consequences of power, demonstration cases, and assumptions are presented. A theorem and testable hypothesis are proposed. The final product is a conceptual map which illustrates the contents of the concept analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Hawks. 1991. Power: a concept analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01734.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning.

This paper develops a theory of how interpretative processes constrain inferential performance on conditional reasoning tasks. Experiment 1 investigated the hypothesis that performance on common reasoning tasks is mediated by different interpretive variables. Necessity and sufficiency relations predicted performance on the conditional arguments task, whereas on the Wason task, performance was predicted by whether the conditional statement instantiated a deontic or a factual relation. Performance on the truth-table task was predicted by both sets of variables. Experiment 2 explored the mapping relation between interpretation, representation, and inference. It was observed that conditional responses to the Wason and arguments tasks were based on different representations of the conditional relationship. These data rule out a simple model of the interplay between interpretation and reasoning in which the interpretation of a statement is driven solely by its content, and instead, indicate that the interpretation of conditional relations is task-specific.

Concept Formation↗