PubMed · 1864217
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J M Rawlings. 1991. Antimony electrodes.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01297474
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
[reaction: see text] The reaction of benzyloxyfluorodiazirine (3) with SbF(5) in benzene gives PhCH(2)OCF, which undergoes SbF(5)-mediated fragmentation to PhCH(2)(+), CO, and SbF(6)(-); the benzyl cation alkylates benzene to yield diphenylmethane. Phenoxyfluorodiazirine (4) reacts with SbF(5) in benzene to give PhOCF and (ultimately) triphenylmethane by a pathway that avoids fragmentation.
A review of the scientific papers published on inorganic gunshot residue (GSR) analysis permits to study how the particle analysis has shown its capability in detection and identification of gunshot residue. The scanning electron microscope can be the most powerful tool for forensic scientists to determine the proximity to a discharging firearm and/or the contact with a surface exposed to GSR. Particle analysis can identify individual gunshot residue particles through both morphological and elemental characteristics. When particles are detected on the collected sample, the analytical results can be interpreted following rules of a formal general interpretative system, to determine whether they come from the explosion of a primer or from other possible sources. The particles on the sample are compared with an abstract idea of "unique" GSR particle produced by the sole source of the explosion of a primer. "Uniqueness" is not the only problem related to GSR detection and identification for a forensic scientist. With "not-unique" particles interpretation of results is extremely important. The evidential strength of "not-unique" particles can increase with a more fruitful interpretative framework based on Bayes rule. For the assessment of the value of a GSR in linking a suspect and a crime, it is important to compare two hypothesis: the first can be that of the evidence if the suspect has been shooting in a specific situation, the second that of the evidence if the suspect was not involved in this shooting. This case specific or case-by-case approach is closer to what the court is interested in. The authors consider that a "case-by-case" approach should be followed whenever possible. Research of models and data such as those developed in other trace evidence material (fibres, glass, etc.) using a Bayesian approach is suggested in the interpretation of GSR.
Tip-growing organisms maintain an apparently essential tip-high gradient of cytoplasmic Ca(2+). In the oomycete Saprolegnia ferax, in pollen tubes and root hairs, the gradient is produced by a tip-localized Ca(2+) influx from the external medium. Such a gradient is normally dispensable for Neurospora crassa hyphae, which may maintain their Ca(2+) gradient by some form of internal recycling. We localized Ca(2+) in N. crassa hyphae at the ultrastructural level using two techniques (a) electron spectroscopic imaging of freeze-dried hyphae and (b) pyroantimoniate precipitation. The results of both methods support the presence of Ca(2+) in the wall vesicles and Golgi body equivalents, providing a plausible mechanism for the generation and maintenance of the gradient by Ca(2+) shuttling in vesicles to the apex, without exogenous Ca(2+) influx. Ca(2+) sequestration into the vesicles seems to be dependent on Ca(2+)-ATPases since cyclopiazonic acid, a specific inhibitor of Ca(2+) pumps, eliminated all Ca(2+) deposits from the vesicles of N. crassa.