Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1800110

Quantifying variation in physical load using exposure-vs-time data.

Abstract

Variation has in recent years become an important concept in the analysis of loads on the locomotor system in occupational life. Studies of controlled variation in isometric exercise have concentrated on the effects of introducing pauses at regular intervals into an otherwise constant load. A complete description of the cyclic character of such regimens requires a set of three parameters. We suggest the use of the set mean load/cycle time/duty cycle. The design of laboratory studies should more often be based upon the activity patterns found in occupational life. In studies observing exposure, the variation concept introduces problems concerning how to define and how to quantify 'variation'. It is shown that present methods (APDF analysis and contraction frequency analysis) individually fail to pick up important aspects of variation. A new method for exposure variation analysis (EVA) is proposed. Examples are presented of EVA performed on vocational EMG registrations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S E Mathiassen, J Winkel. 1991. Quantifying variation in physical load using exposure-vs-time data.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108964889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of surgeons' physical fatigue in the new ergonomic environment of laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine what the differences are in the movement of the surgeon's axial skeleton between laparoscopic and open operations. METHODS: Surgeons' body positions were recorded on videotape during four laparoscopic (LAP) and six open (OP) operations. The percent of time the head and back were in a normal, bent, or twisted position as well as the number of changes in head and back position were tabulated using a computer program. A separate laboratory study was performed on four surgeons "walking" a 0.5-inch polyethylene tubing forward and backward using laparoscopic and open techniques. The movements of the surgeons' head, trunk, and pelvis were measured using a three-camera kinematic system (Kin). The center of pressure was recorded using a floor-mounted forceplate (Fp). RESULTS: In the operating room surgeons' head and back positions were more often straight in laparoscopic procedures and more often bent in open operations. The number of changes in back position per minute were significantly decreased when the laparoscopic-only part of surgery was analyzed. In the laboratory the subjects' head position was significantly (p = 0.02) more upright and the anteroposterior (AP) and rotational range of motion of the head was significantly reduced during laparoscopy. Subjects' CP was more anterior and there was a significant reduction in the AP range of motion of the CP during laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that surgeons exhibit decreased mobility of the head and back and less anteroposterior weight shifting during laparoscopic manipulations despite a more upright posture. This more restricted posture during laparoscopic surgery may induce fatigue by limiting the natural changes in body posture that occur during open surgery.

Ergonomics

Participatory ergonomics in a red meat packing plant. Part II: Case studies.

Three ergonomics-related case studies are presented to demonstrate the problem-solving method used by two participatory ergonomics teams. The problem-solving method was adapted from principles related to quality management (e.g., participation, structure, a scientific approach, and decision by consensus). The first two steps of the problem-solving method were related to identification and evaluation of the problem; the latter three steps were related to solution development, implementation, and evaluation. The problem evaluation process included the collection of background, exposure, and effects data. Solution development following evaluation of the problem started with a brainstorming session, then discussion to select interventions by consensus. The format for presenting the case studies was intended to be concise and visual with the intent of effectively documenting the teams' problem-solving processes.

Ergonomics