Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1794636

Individual differences in speech recognition ability: implications for hearing aid selection.

Abstract

Hearing-impaired listeners with similar audiometric configurations often demonstrate varying abilities to understand speech in the presence of noise and/or reverberation. To date, however, it is unclear which auditory mechanisms are responsible for these perceptual deficits. This lack of information is unfortunate, as individual susceptibility to noise and reverberation may explain why hearing-impaired listeners receive varying degrees of benefit from rehabilitative strategies. The present discussion will examine: (1) individual speech recognition susceptibility to noise and reverberation in hearing-impaired listeners and (2) auditory and cognitive hypotheses to explain individual differences in speech recognition performance. Theoretical and clinical implications for hearing aid selection procedures will be discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C Crandell. 1991. Individual differences in speech recognition ability: implications for hearing aid selection.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199112001-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Fitting strategies and candidature criteria for unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings.

In this paper, hearing aid fitting strategies are reviewed and candidature criteria for unilateral and bilateral fittings are discussed. Fitting strategies are primarily governed by the objectives of hearing aid fitting that can be set in different ways. Based on common goals, fitting strategies can be broken down into three stages: (1) basic fitting, (2) fine-tuning and (3) verification and validation. A fine-tuning concept basing on so-called meta-controllers is described and the issue of bilateral fitting strategies is discussed. In a first order approach, bilateral hearing aids can be fitted in parallel as unilateral aids, followed by bilateral fine-tuning, making sure that loudness is balanced and overall loudness is accepted. Parallel fitting of bilateral aids is more favourable than sequential fitting to avoid rejection because of a negative experience with unilateral amplification due to difficulties in disadvantageous listening situations. Candidature criteria are presented by means of a flow chart structuring the decision making process and arriving at the conclusion that bilateral fitting should be considered the normal case. If there is any doubt about the benefit of bilateral fitting, a trial with bilateral aids should be performed.

Hearing Aids↗