Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1780224

Physiological considerations in seating.

Abstract

Physiological changes occur with change of posture. Seating imposes significant effect on the cardiovascular, respiratory, abdominal, renal and neurological systems. The presence of severe skeletal deformities can significantly alter the physiological responses of the individual to changes in posture. In the case of severe kyphoscoliosis profound haemodynamic changes may occur. Lung perfusion has been shown to be posture dependent and the imposition of a specific seated position may have profound effects. This may compound existing lung problems for example bronchiectasis, which is not uncommon in these individuals, leading to hypoventilation. Abdominal compression which can occur with the patient in a flexed position can exacerbate a hiatus hernia, which can be both uncomfortable for the patient and may lead to feeding difficulties. The flexion at the hips of the lower limbs may also lead to problems of renal drainage especially where there is a catheter or other drainage appliance. Seating significantly affects many neurological reflexes. For example the presence of an extensor pattern can be helped by the adoption of a flexed position. The presence of pain can also influence the neurological response to a specific position. Those providing seating systems must consider the physiological effects that occur and compromise between these and the other requirements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C P Stewart. 1991. Physiological considerations in seating.. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649109164288

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Etiology of the resting myoelectric activity of the levator ani muscle: physioanatomic study with a new theory.

Of all the striated muscles in the bodies of mammals, only the pelvic floor muscles, which include the levator ani (LA), have resting electric activity. The cause and function of this resting myoelectric activity are not exactly known. The current study investigated the effect of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and visceral weight on the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the LA, seeking to elucidate its cause and function. A series of 18 subjects (12 women, 6 men, mean age 38.6 years) were subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for calcular cholecystitis. Prior to cholecystectomy, the resting LA EMG and IAP were recorded with the patient in the recumbent and erect positions. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the IAP was elevated by CO2 insufflation in increments of 5 cm of H(2)O, and the LA EMG activity was recorded for the recumbent and vertical positions during inflation and after deflation at the end of the operation. In 5/18 patients in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy was extended to open cholecystectomy, the IAP and LA EMG were also registered. The study also included histologic examination of the LA muscle from 15 cadavers (7 adults, 8 neonates). Levator ani EMG increased ( p < 0.05) on standing. At operation, IAP elevation was associated with a significant increase of LA EMG activity. On deflation, the IAP and LA EMG activity level returned to the pre-insufflation state. In open cholecystectomy, the IAP was zero and the LA EMG recorded no activity for the recumbent position, but there was an activity for the vertical position. Histologically, the lateral part of the LA in the adult cadavers consisted solely of skeletal muscle fibers. Proceeding medially, smooth muscle fibers started to appear and gradually increase until, at the midportion, the LA split into two layers, a deep layer consisting of smooth muscle fibers and a superficial layer consisting of skeletal fibers. In neonates, the LA was composed of purely skeletal muscle fibers. The LA EMG activity seems to be related to both the IAP and the visceral weight. It is probably attributable to the presence of smooth muscle bundles in the LA muscle. The LA EMG activity increased with the elevation of the IAP and visceral weight, which resulted in increased muscle tone to oppose the augmented pressure or weight. This effect seems to be mediated through the straining-levator reflex. A chronic increase of IAP or visceral overload is suggested to affect muscle integrity and function.

Abdomen↗

Neural basis of a simple behavior: abdominal positioning in crayfish.

Crustaceans have been used extensively as models for studying the nervous system. Members of the Order Decapoda, particularly the larger species such as lobsters and crayfish, have large segmented abdomens that are positioned by tonic flexor and extensor muscles. Importantly, the innervation of these tonic muscles is known in some detail. Each abdominal segment in crayfish is innervated bilaterally by three sets of nerves. The anterior pair of nerves in each ganglion controls the swimmeret appendages and sensory supply. The middle pair of nerves innervates the tonic extensor muscles and the regional sensory supply. The superficial branch of the most posterior pair of nerves in each ganglion is exclusively motor and supplies the tonic flexor muscles of that segment. The extension and flexion motor nerves contain six motor neurons, each of which is different in axonal diameter and thus produces impulses of different amplitude. Motor programs controlling each muscle can be characterized by the identifiable motor neurons that are activated. Early work in this field discovered that specific central interneurons control the abdominal positioning motor neurons. These interneurons were first referred to as "command neurons" and later as "command elements." Stimulation of an appropriate command element causes a complex, widespread output involving dozens of motor neurons. The output can be patterned even though the stimulus to the command element is of constant interval. The command elements are identifiable cells. When a stimulus is repeated in a command element, from either the same individual or from different individuals, the output is substantially the same. This outcome depends upon several factors. First, the command elements are not only identifiable, but they make many synapses with other neurons, and the synapses are substantially invariant. There are separate flexion-producing and extension-producing command elements. Abdominal flexion-producing command elements excite other flexion elements and inhibit extensor command elements. The extension producing elements do the opposite. These interactions insure that interneurons of a particular class (flexion- or extension-producing) synaptically recruit perhaps twenty others of similar output, and that command elements promoting the opposing movements are inhibited. This strong reciprocity and the recruitment of similar command elements give a powerful motor program that appears to mimic behavior.

Abdomen↗

Accuracy of image fusion of normal upper abdominal organs visualized with PET/CT.

Although PET/CT scanners have the potential for precise fused registration of structures visualized on both PET and CT, physiological motion during the acquisition of both studies may alter the appearance of organ shape, size or location. The degree of possible mismatch in abdominal organ size and position between PET and CT has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the consistency in location and measured size of upper abdominal organs with PET and CT using a combined PET/CT system. Forty-six consecutive inpatients who underwent clinical PET/CT scans for suspected cancer were evaluated. CT and PET images attenuation corrected by both CT and germanium-68 transmission scans were obtained, and we separately determined the location of the top and bottom (height), anterior and posterior margins (thickness), and right and left margins (width) for each organ, including liver, spleen, and bilateral kidneys, using CT and both sets of PET images. Differences between the two modalities in terms of location and measured organ size were investigated. In the upper margin of the liver and lower margin of the spleen, more than 10% of the cases showed a larger discrepancy (>20 mm) between CT-based and Ge-corrected PET-based measurements, although the differences in the positions of the edges were less than 10 mm in most cases. The center of the liver tended to be located cephalad and to the right of the body, and that of the spleen tended to be cephalad and posterior on PET, as compared with CT. Moreover, the center of both kidneys tended to be seen cephalad, posterior, and to the right on PET. The liver appeared slightly larger on PET than CT in thickness (CT vs CT-corrected PET vs Ge-corrected PET = 156 mm vs 162 mm vs 162 mm) and width (186 mm vs 189 mm vs 188 mm). By contrast, the spleen appeared slightly smaller on PET than CT in height (84 mm vs 77 mm vs 80 mm) and width (85 mm vs 81 mm vs 80 mm). A similar tendency was observed in the left kidney (105 mm vs 100 mm vs 99 mm in height, and 64 mm vs 59 mm vs 58 mm in width) and the right kidney (99 mm vs 93 mm vs 93 mm in height, and 64 mm vs 59 mm vs 60 mm in width). These differences between the two modalities were statistically significant ( P<0.05). In conclusion, minor mismatches in location and organ size were found to exist between CT and PET images, in part due to physiological motion. Although these differences could potentially affect the quality of the image registrations, they were generally of a modest nature.

Abdomen↗