Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 17165308

The normal pericardium does not affect left ventricular function.

Abstract

Whether the normal pericardium exerts a constraining effect on left ventricular (LV) diastolic compliance and/or systolic function is controversial. Left ventricular filling and performance were studied in 15 patients by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) measuring end-diastolic area (EDa), end-systolic area (ESa), ejection fraction area (EFa), and hemodynamics immediately pre- and post-pericardiotomy. To diminish the influences of other variables such as surgical stimulation, chest wall constraint, and autoregulation, measurements were performed in deeply anesthetized patients with the chest fully opened immediately before and after pericardiotomy (PC). No significant echocardiographic or hemodynamic changes were observed after PC. Although alterations in compliance cannot be excluded, no significant changes in LV diastolic filling (EDa, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP]) or systolic performance (EFa, cardiac output [CO]) were found. Therefore, it is concluded that the normal pericardium does not exert a measurable constraining effect on LV performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Konstadt, D Thys, D Reich, M Hubbard, F Follis, M Goldman. 1987. The normal pericardium does not affect left ventricular function.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-6296(87)80038-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗