Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 17040583

Spinal accessory nerve function after neck dissections.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate spinal accessory nerve function after functional neck dissection (FND) and radical neck dissection (RND) by monitoring the nerve with electromyographic (EMG) examinations. A prospective, double-blind, clinical study was undertaken in 21 patients (42 neck side dissections) operated on for head and neck malignant diseases, separated into two groups: 10 neck sides in the RND group and 32 neck sides in the FND group. Electromyographic examinations were performed pre-operatively and post-operatively in the third week and third and ninth months. Additionally, a questionnaire, modified from the neck dissection impairment index, was applied to all the patients in order to assess shoulder function in the ninth post-operative month. All patients had maximum EMG scores pre-operatively. Following the operation, motor amplitudes decreased in both groups. At the third post-operative month, amplitudes decreased to their lowest values. As expected, the decreases in amplitude and EMG score were more prominent in the RND group. Following reinnervation, the amplitudes of the trapezius motor response increased in the FND group but never reached pre-operative values (during the time of follow up). The FND group scores for pain, neck and shoulder stiffness, and disability in heavy object lifting, light object lifting and reaching overhead were significantly lower than those of the RND group. In FND, one aims to preserve anatomically the spinal accessory nerve, and it is presumed to be intact after the procedure. However, using EMG nerve function monitoring, our study revealed that profound spinal nerve injury was detected immediately after FND surgery, which tended to improve over subsequent months but had not regained its original function by the end of the ninth post-operative month.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K S Orhan, T Demirel, B Baslo, E K Orhan, E A Yücel, Y Güldiken, K Değer. 2006-07-03. Spinal accessory nerve function after neck dissections.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215106002052

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Isolated spinal accessory neuropathy in an adolescent: a case study.

We describe a case of dynamic scapular winging due to trapezius muscle paresis following a sport-related injury of the accessory nerve. The typical clinical findings related to the peripheral nerve involved, the importance of neurophysiologic work-up, and possibilities for treatment are discussed.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗

Evidence of significant sternocleidomastoid atrophy following modified radical neck dissection type III.

BACKGROUND: Although modified radical neck dissection type III preserves the spinal accessory nerve, the internal jugular vein, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle, the authors believe there is a significant morbidity to retained structures after neck dissection. Although the effects on accessory nerve function and internal jugular vein patency have been documented, there is little information about sternocleidomastoid morphology and function following modified dissection. METHODS: Using a SonoSite ultrasound machine, the authors assessed sternocleidomastoid muscle morphology, at rest and during contraction, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent modified radical neck dissection type III with no radiotherapy. All patients had head and neck cancers and received unilateral neck dissection as part of their primary treatment. Static and dynamic measurements were performed at three different levels of the muscle, with the neck in the neutral position. The contralateral neck of the same patient was used as a control. Local muscle asymmetry patterns were calculated using the Absolute Asymmetry Index. RESULTS: Significant sternocleidomastoid atrophy was noted on the side of modified radical neck dissection type III (p < 0.05). The atrophy was particularly marked in the caudal and middle portions of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and was likely related to damage to the segmental blood supply in the caudal and middle portions of the muscle as well as injury to the innervation. CONCLUSION: Despite evidence of significant atrophy, the muscle still underwent morphological changes during contraction that were comparable to those on the normal control side.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗