Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16989263

Mass immunization programs: principles and standards.

Abstract

Mass immunization involves delivering immunizations to a large number of people at one or more locations in a short interval of time. Good mass immunization programs apply planning and quality standards that maximize return on resources invested and provide the greatest individual benefits when immunizing many people in a short period of time. These programs can be used to counter contagious outbreaks, adopted as a repeated means of sustained healthcare delivery, or applied where many people move through a specific place in a short interval of time. Relevant quality standards address appropriate facilities and supplies, training of professional and paraprofessional staff, education of potential vaccinees and methods to screen them for contraindications to immunization, safeguards against anaphylaxis and syncope, documentation, safety surveillance, and a quality-improvement program. Successful mass immunization programs require early planning that builds on existing competencies. As the number of available vaccines increases, prioritizing which vaccines to administer during mass campaigns requires consideration of effectiveness, safety, and a cost-benefit equation from both the individual and community perspectives. Mass immunization campaigns aim to maximize the health of a population, but such campaigns need to be customized based on individual contraindications to immunization. Mass immunization programs need to be conducted ethically, with considerations of benefit versus risk and the need for detailed education of healthcare workers and vaccinees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J D Grabenstein, R L Nevin. 2006. Mass immunization programs: principles and standards.. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36583-4_3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Lifestyle interventions in cancer survivors: designing programs that meet the needs of this vulnerable and growing population.

In the world today, there are roughly 25 million cancer survivors. Although the increasing numbers of survivors testifies to the success of early detection and treatment, there is a downside. Cancer survivors are at increased risk for second cancers, other forms of comorbidity (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis), and functional decline. Lifestyle factors, such as a healthy diet, regular exercise, and smoking cessation may prevent these conditions and improve survivors' quality of life. Data also are accumulating to suggest that healthful lifestyle practices and successful weight management may prevent progressive or recurrent disease. Previous surveys conducted among both adult and pediatric cancer survivors indicate that most survivors have high levels of interest in diet and exercise interventions. Additionally, survivors who smoke report high levels of interest in interventions aimed at smoking cessation. Many factors, such as intervention timing and duration and channels of delivery, must be carefully considered in developing interventions that best meet the needs of this vulnerable population. Total transparency also is necessary in reporting the results of trials to ensure the inclusion of information regarding proportional accrual, attrition, and study sample sociodemographic characteristics to move toward the development of interventions most likely to gain broad-scale acceptance and adherence. Home-based interventions that rely on telephone counseling, mailed materials, or computer-assisted approaches offer promising means of reaching the geographically dispersed population of cancer survivors. More research is necessary to develop interventions that can reach and effectively promote long-term behavior change in this ever-increasing population.

Health Education↗