Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16940864

Melioidosis.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Melioidosis is increasingly recognized around the world. Despite several decades of clinical research, the mortality rate for melioidosis remains high. This review focuses on studies that relate to patient management, including risk factors, diagnosis, treatment and prediction of the outcome. A brief summary of studies relating to genomics and genotyping, immunology and pathogenesis is provided. RECENT FINDINGS: Involvement in the tsunami of December 2004 is a risk factor for melioidosis, and risk may extend to individuals who were uninjured bystanders. Several standard microbiological techniques used to culture and identify Burkholderia pseudomallei have been evaluated. Polymerase chain reaction has been developed for bacterial identification, although limited evaluation has been performed in the clinical setting. Two trials of antimicrobial therapy provide evidence with which to refine existing treatment protocols. Inexpensive clinical and laboratory predictors for poor outcome have been described. Several putative vaccine candidates have been proposed and studied in animals, but no vaccine is on the immediate horizon. SUMMARY: None of the studies reviewed here report strategies that reduce mortality. A key area for future research is the identification of affordable interventions that lower the death rate, and are applicable to low-resource settings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sharon J Peacock. 2006. Melioidosis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qco.0000244046.31135.b3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[The Norwegian vaccination program].

Development of vaccines has in many ways been the art of the possible, using current knowledge about infections and microbes to devise new products. The aim of every vaccination is to prevent disease, but use of vaccines within vaccination programs is usually targeted not only to protect the individual, but also to changing the epidemiology of the disease. Several new vaccines will become available during the next decade, but the vaccination program will probably not be dramatically changed. Increased knowledge about the immune system might, in a longer time perspective, make it possible to rebuild a vaccination program on a new basis. Immunisations can perhaps be used for targeting the immune system in ways that still give protection against the specific infections, but in addition lead to better health through general protection against diseases, less allergy and less autoimmune diseases than we have today.

Bacterial Vaccines↗

Potential source of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain attenuation determined by genome comparison.

Francisella tularensis is a bacterial pathogen that causes the zoonotic disease tularemia and is important to biodefense. Currently, the only vaccine known to confer protection against tularemia is a specific live vaccine strain (designated LVS) derived from a virulent isolate of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica. The origin and source of attenuation of this strain are not known. To assist with the design of a defined live vaccine strain, we sought to determine the genetic basis of the attenuation of LVS. This analysis relied primarily on the comparison between the genome of LVS and Francisella tularensis holarctica strain FSC200, which differ by only 0.08% of their nucleotide sequences. Under the assumption that the attenuation was due to a loss of function(s), only coding regions were examined in this comparison. To complement this analysis, the coding regions of two slightly more distantly related Francisella tularensis strains were also compared against the LVS coding regions. Thirty-five genes show unique sequence variations predicted to alter the protein sequence in LVS compared to the other Francisella tularensis strains. Due to these polymorphisms, the functions of 15 of these genes are very likely lost or impaired. Seven of these genes were demonstrated to be under stronger selective constraints, suggesting that they are the most probable to be the source of LVS attenuation and useful for a newly defined vaccine.

Bacterial Vaccines↗

[Gender differences in response to preventive health care interventions. Do we have to treat girls and boys differently to treat them equally?].

In spite of well-recognised differences in morbidity patterns among boys and girls, differences in their response to common interventions like vaccinations have rarely been considered. Our research in vaccinations and vitamin A supplementation has suggested sex differences in the response to these interventions. If these observations reflect a general pattern, it may be that, in order to be treated equally, boys and girls should be treated differently.

Bacterial Vaccines↗