Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16873978

Assessing human movement with accelerometry.

Thomas W Pelham·Michael G Robinson·Laurence E Holt
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The methods for measuring and evaluating human movement have advanced rapidly over the past 2 decades. The use of smaller, lighter, more powerful personal computers, digital video cameras and miniature, portable accelerometers have allowed the health professional, engineer, sports coach and scientist to very precisely record and quantify human movements on the sports field, in the business office, industrial setting and in the home. Most human motion analysis systems have evolved to meet the particular needs of the user. One such system that has developed over the past ten years in the Sport Science Laboratory at Dalhousie University is the Padlog series of accelerometer systems. This paper will discuss the development the Padlog systems at Dalhousie.

Explore related subjects

AccelerationHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementNova ScotiaEvaluation StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas W Pelham, Michael G Robinson, Laurence E Holt. 2006. Assessing human movement with accelerometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16873978/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Bayesian processing of vestibular information.

Complex self-motion stimulations in the dark can be powerfully disorienting and can create illusory motion percepts. In the absence of visual cues, the brain has to use angular and linear acceleration information provided by the vestibular canals and the otoliths, respectively. However, these sensors are inaccurate and ambiguous. We propose that the brain processes these signals in a statistically optimal fashion, reproducing the rules of Bayesian inference. We also suggest that this processing is related to the statistics of natural head movements. This would create a perceptual bias in favour of low velocity and acceleration. We have constructed a Bayesian model of self-motion perception based on these assumptions. Using this model, we have simulated perceptual responses to centrifugation and off-vertical axis rotation and obtained close agreement with experimental findings. This demonstrates how Bayesian inference allows to make a quantitative link between sensor noise and ambiguities, statistics of head movement, and the perception of self-motion.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2006

A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

The otoliths are stimulated in the same fashion by gravitational and inertial forces, so otolith signals are ambiguous indicators of self-orientation. The ambiguity can be resolved with added visual information indicating orientation and acceleration with respect to the earth. Here we present a Bayesian model of the statistically optimal combination of noisy vestibular and visual signals. Likelihoods associated with sensory measurements are represented in an orientation/acceleration space. The likelihood function associated with the otolith signal illustrates the ambiguity; there is no unique solution for self-orientation or acceleration. Likelihood functions associated with other sensory signals can resolve this ambiguity. In addition, we propose two priors, each acting on a dimension in the orientation/acceleration space: the idiotropic prior and the no-acceleration prior. We conducted experiments using a motion platform and attached visual display to examine the influence of visual signals on the interpretation of the otolith signal. Subjects made pitch and acceleration judgments as the vestibular and visual signals were manipulated independently. Predictions of the model were confirmed: (1) visual signals affected the interpretation of the otolith signal, (2) less variable signals had more influence on perceived orientation and acceleration than more variable ones, and (3) combined estimates were more precise than single-cue estimates. We also show that the model can explain some well-known phenomena including the perception of upright in zero gravity, the Aubert effect, and the somatogravic illusion.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2006

Kinematics of the transition between walking and running when gradually changing speed.

The purpose of this study was to examine kinematics of the walk-to-run transition (WRT) and run-to-walk transition (RWT) when speed is altered with a constant acceleration of 0.1 m s(-2), respectively -0.1 m s(-2). Thirteen women (height: 168.9+/-3.36 cm) performed gait transitions on a motor-driven treadmill. WRT-speed was 2.16+/-0.12 m s(-1), RWT-speed 2.19+/-0.12 m s(-1). Kinematics were examined in the range from eight steps before to eight steps after transition in order to identify the possible occurrence of a transition process to facilitate the actual realization of transition. A transition step in which the main changes from one gait to another are realized is present in WRT and RWT. Despite this clear discontinuity, a transition process also appeared in both transitions. In the WRT, transition was prepared and kinematic adaptations were found in the last swing before transition leading to altered landing conditions. During RWT posttransition changes were observed and RWT was only completed after reorientation of the trunk in the first walking stride after transition. A noteworthy finding was that spatiotemporal (presence of a flight phase), kinematic (knee flexion) and energetic (kinetic and gravitational potential energy fluctuating in-phase versus out-of-phase) criteria to define transition stride correspond to each other. Furthermore, a functional interlimb asymmetry was recognized as a unique characteristic of the transition stride, offering a fourth way of identifying the transition stride.

Acceleration↗