Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1687175

[Inhalation chambers].

Abstract

Since the last 30 years metered-dose pressurised aerosols have largely contributed to the treatment of asthma with inhaled beta-2 stimulants and corticosteroids. Two problems, however, are associated with these aerosols: (1) small amounts of active substance are deposited in the lungs and larger amounts in the mouth and pharynx; (2) aerosols are uneasy to use because of lack of coordination between actuation and inhalation and absence of apnoea at the end of inspiration. An elegant solution of these problems is the inhalation chamber: a reservoir inserted between the patient's mouth and the aerosol, which increases the lung deposition, reduces the ENT deposition and makes coordination unnecessary. The inhalation chamber is primarily indicated for patients with poor coordination. When beta-2 stimulants are inhaled the therapeutic benefit can be measured by a gain of efficacy in poor coordinators. When corticosteroids are inhaled the benefit is measured by a better local tolerance and, to some extent, by a gain in therapeutic effectiveness; the inhalation chamber here is indicated for patients with ENT complications (e.g. candidiasis, dysphonia) or for the most severe cases requiring high-dose therapy. The introduction of inhalation chamber must be regarded as an improvement in the management of asthma, taking into account the potential risk of poor compliance, and in such cases the development of powder inhalers may be envisaged.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Braunstein. 1991. [Inhalation chambers].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1687175/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Concentration-dependence of biomarkers of exposure of methylenediphenyl-diisocyanate following acute inhalation exposure of rats.

Rats were nose-only exposed for 6 h to polymeric methylenediphenyl-diisocyanate (pMDI). Concentrations varied from 0.12 to 12.7 mg/m(3) using a highly respirable aerosol. In regard to the concentration of the monomeric fraction of MDI contained in pMDI, the lowest concentration was in the range of the current workplace limit of MDI which is 0.05 mg/m(3). Biomarkers of exposure were determined in hydrolyzed urine (collection started after cessation of exposure for approximately 18 h; acid hydrolysis) and hydrolyzed hemoglobin (collection of blood approximately 20 h after cessation of exposure; alkaline hydrolysis). The determination revealed two-order of magnitudes higher yields of the biomarkers in urine when compared to hemoglobin. The concentration of analytes from the respective biological matrix was highly correlated with the airborne concentration of pMDI whilst their yields exhibited a reciprocal relationship to the airborne concentration of pMDI. A linear relationship could only be demonstrated by using a logarithmic transformation of data. With respect to the amount of 4,4'-methylenediphenyldianiline creatinine (MDA/g creatinine) in hydrolyzed urine of rats at an exposure level similar to the current workplace concentration of MDI, this marker of exposure was approximately 10-times lower in rats than predicted for humans. This suggests that the extrapolation of animal data to man as well as from one exposure regimen to another, without taking into consideration the different deposition/retention patterns of vapors (<or=0.05 mg/m(3)) or aerosols of MDI, might be error prone. In summary, taking into account previous and current experimental evidence, these data substantiate further that the formation of MDI-related biomarkers appear to be governed by spontaneously occurring, scavenging reactions at the portal-of-entry. Comparison of MDI with its corresponding amine support that the analytes determined stem from conjugated MDI rather than in vivo hydrolyzed MDI.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Arterial hypoxemia in exercising thoroughbreds is not affected by pre-exercise nedocromil sodium inhalation.

It has been reported that pulmonary injury (i.e. capillary stress failure) evoked histamine release from airway inflammatory/mast cells contributes to exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia (EIAH) and that pre-exercise inhalation of nedocromil sodium mitigated EIAH in human subjects 'Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 29, (1997) 10-16'. Because exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage due to capillary stress failure is routinely observed in racehorses, we examined whether nedocromil inhalation would similarly benefit EIAH and desaturation of hemoglobin in horses. Two sets of experiments, namely, placebo studies followed in 7 days by pre-exercise nedocromil sodium (30 puffs=60 mg) inhalation experiments were carried out on 7 healthy, sound, exercise-trained thoroughbred horses. In both treatments, arterial and mixed-venous blood-gas/pH measurements were made at rest pre- and post-placebo/drug inhalation, as well as during incremental exercise leading to galloping at 14 m/sec on a 3.5% uphill grade-a workload that elicited maximal heart rate and caused pulmonary hemorrhage in all horses in both treatments, thereby indicating capillary stress failure had occurred. In both treatments, significant (P<0.0001) EIAH of a similar magnitude had developed by 30 sec of maximal exertion, and further significant changes in arterial O(2) tension did not occur as exercise duration progressed to 120 sec. Thus, pre-exercise inhalation of nedocromil sodium was ineffective in modifying the development and/or severity of EIAH in the present study. These findings argue against the airway inflammatory mediator(s) release hypothesis for causing arterial hypoxemia in racehorses.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Inhaled corticosteroid doses in asthma: an evidence-based approach.

OBJECTIVE: To define the evidence for doses of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma and describe this in clinically meaningful, evidence-based terms. DATA SOURCE: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We identified systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of dosing of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Data on efficacy and safety of different doses were extracted from meta-analyses and summarised as the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). DATA SYNTHESIS: Inhaled corticosteroids were highly efficacious, with a relatively flat dose-response curve. Three patients needed to be treated with fluticasone 100 microg daily to prevent worsening asthma (NNT 3), and for fluticasone 1000 microg the NNT was 2.1 patients. The dose-response curve for side effects was steep. For a dose of fluticasone 100 microg, oral candidiasis developed in one of every 90 subjects treated (NNH 90). In contrast, the NNH for fluticasone 1000 microg and 2000 microg daily were 23 and 6, respectively. CONCLUSION: Level 1 evidence supports the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Clinicians should review doses of inhaled corticosteroids used for treating patients with asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗