Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16825123

DNA microarray applications in functional genomics.

Abstract

The successful completion of the Human Genome Project and the achievement of similar goals in other species have generated a huge amount of free available information about the genomic sequence of different organisms, opening the door to a postgenome era where new challenges arise. One of the most ambitious objectives of this new period, addressed by the emerging discipline of functional genomics, attempts to understand the genome and the products it encodes for, and how these gene products interact to produce complex living organisms. This new era is also characterized by the development of new technologies, which have produced genomic tools indispensable for understanding how gene products are regulated in normal and diseased conditions on a global genome scale. One of these technologies is DNA microarrays, turned into a very popular tool in the last years. Although the most common use of DNA microarrays is gene expression profiling, scientists have successfully used them for multiple applications, including genotyping, sequencing, DNA copy number analysis, and DNA-protein interactions, among others. In summary, DNA microarrays are changing the way biomedicine and other disciplines are addressing different biological questions and will allow the translation of genome research to the clinic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pedro Jares. DNA microarray applications in functional genomics.. https://doi.org/10.1080/01913120500521380

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics↗

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics↗