Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16814028

Ectoparasite control.

Alberto B Broce
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The severity of damage that insects, ticks, and mites may have on their bovine hosts ranges from undetectable effects on energy expenditure to the death of the host. These pest insects can cause direct damage to their hosts by their annoyance, irritation, blood feeding, modification of host behavior, and invasion of tissues. This direct damage can result in such direct losses as dermatitis, anemia,reduction in weight gain performance, devaluation of carcass,injury during pest avoidance, injury by chemical control of pests,necrosis, and death. The main flies that affect cattle performance and specifically, stockers, are discussed in this article.

Explore related subjects

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEctoparasitic InfestationsInsect ControlJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alberto B Broce. 2006. Ectoparasite control.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.03.006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

New anthelmintics for livestock: the time is right.

The viability of small-ruminant enterprises is under threat in some locations because anthelmintic resistance continues to increase in prevalence and severity. Despite this, no new anthelmintic group has been developed for many years, and animal health companies seem unconvinced of the commercial justification for new compounds for the ruminant market. It is now argued, however, that market conditions are becoming favourable because of increases in multiple-drug resistance in nematodes of ruminants and other hosts and because few non-chemical options exist. A new anthelmintic is urgently needed and will find ready acceptance in an increasing market, and with better knowledge of resistance management, greater product longevity can be achieved.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs from different living conditions in Uberlândia, Brazil.

Infection rates with Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. were compared among dogs living under different conditions. Stool samples (n = 433) collected from dogs of different ages, gender, living conditions and origin were analyzed using three techniques, i.e., centrifugal flotation in zinc sulfate solution, centrifugal flotation in sucrose solution, and methylene blue gram safranin staining. Eighty-nine of the samples were from stay dogs living in shelters run by animal protection societies, 199 were from kennels and 122 from households. A total of 119 (29.0%) had G. duodenalis cysts and six (1.4%) were positive for Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. Dogs from kennels were most frequently affected by G. duodenalis (49.7%) while those from shelters showed a higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. (2.2%). A significant difference (p < or = 0.05) was observed between immature dogs and adults only with respect to Giardia infection. There was no significant difference between the gender with regard to the presence of either protozoan.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of meat composition from offspring of cloned and conventionally produced boars.

This study compares the meat composition of the offspring from boars produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (n=4) to that of the offspring from conventionally produced boars (n=3). In total, 89 commercial gilts were artificially inseminated and 61 progressed to term and farrowed. All of the resulting piglets were housed and raised identically under standard commercial settings and slaughtered upon reaching market weight. Loin samples were taken from each slaughtered animal and shipped offsite for meat composition analysis. In total, loin samples from 404 animals (242 from offspring of clones and 162 from controls) were analyzed for 58 different parameters generating 14,036 and 9396 data points from offspring of clones and the controls, respectively. Values for controls were used to establish a range for each parameter. Ten percent was then added to the maximum and subtracted from the minimum of the control range, and all results within this range were considered clinically irrelevant. Of the 14,036 data points from the offspring of clones, only three points were found outside the clinically irrelevant range, two of which were within the range established by the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 18, 2005; website: (www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/). The only outlier was the presence of Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2) in one sample which is typically present in minute quantities in pork; no reference data were found regarding this fatty acid in the USDA National Nutrient Database. In conclusion, these data indicated that meat from the offspring of clones was not chemically different than meat from controls and therefore supported the case for the safety of meat from the offspring of clones.

Animal Husbandry↗