Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16719357

Laser capture microdissection.

Virginia Espina·John Milia·Glendon Wu·Stacy Cowherd·Lance A Liotta
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is a technique for isolating pure cell populations from a heterogeneous tissue section or cytological preparation via direct visualization of the cells. This technique is applicable to molecular profiling of diseased and disease-free tissue, permitting correlation of cellular molecular signatures with specific cell populations. DNA, RNA, or protein analysis can be performed with the microdissected tissue by any method with adequate sensitivity. The principle components of LCM technology are (1) visualization of the cells of interest via microscopy, (2) transfer of laser energy to a thermolabile polymer with formation of a polymer-cell composite, and (3) removal of the cells of interest from the heterogeneous tissue section. LCM is compatible with a variety of tissue types, cellular staining methods, and tissue-preservation protocols that allow microdissection of fresh or archival specimens. LCM platforms are available as a manual system (PixCell; Arcturus Bioscience) or as an automated system (AutoPix).

Explore related subjects

Cell SeparationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLasersMicrodissectionMicromanipulationPolymersSoftwareJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Virginia Espina, John Milia, Glendon Wu, Stacy Cowherd, Lance A Liotta. 2006. Laser capture microdissection.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-993-6_10

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Fluorescent protein pair emit intracellular FRET signal suitable for FACS screening.

The fluorescent proteins ECFP and HcRed were shown to give an easily resolved FRET-signal when expressed as a fusion inside mammalian cells. HeLa-tat cells expressing ECFP, pHcRed, or the fusion protein pHcRed-ECFP were analyzed by flow cytometry after excitation of ECFP. Cells expressing HcRed-ECFP, or ECFP and HcRed, were mixed and FACS-sorted for FRET positive cells: HcRed-ECFP cells were greatly enriched (72 times). Next, cloned human antibodies were fused with ECFP and expressed anchored to the ER membrane. Their cognate antigens (HIV-1 gp120 or gp41) were fused to HcRed and co-expressed in the ER. An increase of 13.5+/-1.5% (mean+/-SEM) and 8.0+/-0.7% in ECFP fluorescence for the specific antibodies reacting with gp120 or gp41, respectively, was noted after photobleaching. A positive control (HcRed-ECFP) gave a 14.8+/-2.6% increase. Surprisingly, the unspecific antibody (anti-TT) showed 12.1+/-1.1% increase, possibly because overexpression in the limited ER compartment gave false FRET signals.

Cell Separation↗
PubMed2006

Wall-yielding properties of cell walls from elongating cucumber hypocotyls in relation to the action of expansin.

The wall-yielding properties of cell walls were examined using frozen-thawed and pressed segments (FTPs) obtained from the elongation zones of cucumber hypocotyls with a newly developed programmable creep meter. The rate of wall extension characteristically changed depending on both tension and pH. By treatment of the FTPs with acid, the yield tension (y) was shifted downward and the extensibility (phi) was increased. However, the downward shift of y was greatly suppressed and the increase in phi was partly inhibited in boiled FTPs. The boiled FTPs reconstituted with expansin fully recovered the acid-induced downward y shift as well as the increase in phi. Even under the tension below y, wall extension took place pH dependently. Such extension was markedly slower (low-rate extension) than that under the tension above y (high-rate extension). At a higher concentration (8 M), urea markedly inhibited the creep ascribable to the inhibition of the acid-induced downward y shift and increase in phi. Moderate concentrations (2 M) of urea promoted wall creep pH dependently. The promotion was equivalent to a 0.5 decrease in pH. The promotion of creep by 2 M urea was observed in boiled FTPs reconstituted with expansin but not in boiled FTPs. These findings indicated that the acid-facilitated creep was controlled by y as well as in cucumber cell walls. However, y and phi might be inseparable and mutually related parameters because the curve of the stress extension rate (SER) showed a gradual change from the low-rate extension to the high-rate extension. Expansin played a role in pH-dependent regulation of both y and phi. The physiological meaning of the pH-dependent regulation of wall creep under different creep tensions is also discussed with reference to a performance chart obtained from the SER curves.

Cell Separation↗
PubMed2006

Rapid direct determination using combined separation by prepared immunomagnetic and flow cytometry of Flavobacterium psychrophilum.

Flavobacterium psychrophilum, the causative agent of bacterial cold-water disease (BCWD), was originally isolated from coho salmon Oncorhychus kisutch in the USA. Bacterial cold-water disease has since been spreading throughout Japan and has caused serious damage to populations of ayu Plecoglossus altivel in many farms and rivers. The rapid method of detecting for F. psuchrophilum is requested, however, traditional methods are laborious because of complicated assay procedures. In this study, a rapid method of detecting F. psychrophilum was developed using a modified method of flow cytometry (FCM) analysis and immunomagnetic separation (IMS). Magnetic iron, in small particles, was prepared by the reaction of a mixture of ferric and ferrous ions under alkaline conditions. The particles were coated with antiserum against F. psychrophilum by dextran. Polyclonal antibodies (anti-F. psychrophilum) conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) were reacted with F. psychrophilum, and then prepared immunomagnetic were applied using IMS, followed by FCM determination. A good correlation was observed between the cell numbers determined by the FCM method and the traditional method in the range of 10(2)-10(8) cells ml(-1). The FCM analysis could count cells within 1min, and the total analysis time, including sample preparation, was less than 2 h.

Cell Separation↗