PubMed · 16696242
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Lyn Whitfield. 2006-04-27. Data collection. Designer data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16696242/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the content of the intensive care unit (ICU) information booklet delivered to patient families, and that of the general information booklet of the hospital in a sample of intensive care, in France. STUDY DESIGN: Survey. METHODS: A sample of 105 ICU was obtained at random from a national database. A survey form was sent to each ICU medical director. The ICU information booklet, that one from the hospital and the corresponding questionnaire of each participating ICU have been studied to assess the percentage of information items present which matched the recommendations of at least one of three different professional guidelines. RESULTS: Fifty-nine ICU answered. We observed a significant (P<0.01) heterogeneity by the kind ICU considered (general, medical, or surgical). The percentage of information items matching guidelines remained low (median: 41%) even if higher (P<10(-3)) than the percentage of items not matching guidelines (median: 6%). Among a panel of items we considered as important, we observed a significant discrepancy (P<10(-3)) between a low citation rate in ICU booklets (median: 14%) and the opinion of doctors who judged it should included in booklets (median: 68%). CONCLUSION: Guidelines in terms of patient and family information in ICU seem to have a mild impact on the information booklets which are also very different among the types of ICU. There is a gap between what doctors judge to be included in booklets and what they effectively write in these documents.
Beginning in the late 1980s, states and the federal government restricted the ability of physicians to "balance bill" Medicare beneficiaries for charges in excess of the copayment and reimbursement amounts approved by Medicare. In this paper, I provide empirical evidence that this policy change resulted in a 9% reduction in out-of-pocket medical expenditures by elderly households. In spite of the change in marginal reimbursement to physicians, however, I find little evidence that the restrictions affected patterns of care. Thus, this restriction on the prices charged by physicians amounted to a transfer from affected physicians to affected patients.
This paper considers some issues in the provision of adult bereavement support in UK hospices. The paper is based on the findings of a multi-method study conducted in two phases over 30 months (2003-2005) to examine the nature and quality of adult bereavement support in UK hospices from the perspectives of bereaved people and professional and volunteer bereavement workers [Field, Reid, Payne, & Relf (2005). Adult Bereavement Support in Five Hospices in England. Sheffield, UK: Palliative and End-of-Life Care Research Group, University of Sheffield. (Available from Professor Payne)]. It discusses the importance of continuity between pre-bereavement and bereavement support, the integration of bereavement services within hospices and the involvement of volunteers in bereavement support. It then discusses the engagement of UK hospices in the broader development of bereavement support. Although hospices have developed expertise in supporting bereaved people, our research suggests that they have not had a major impact on other health service providers, such as general practitioners and distinct nurses and staff in acute hospital trusts, in this area.