Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16685333

A framework for characterizing terminological systems.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The notion of a terminological system (TS) is complex due to the broad range of systems, applications, and clinical domains. A uniform approach to describe the characteristics of TSs is lacking. This impedes furthering understanding, applicability, mutual comparison and development of TSs. For these reasons we propose a terminological systems characterization framework. METHODS: Relevant issues pertaining to TSs and terminology servers have been extracted from literature describing requirements and functionality of TSs. From these issues, features have been distilled and further refined. A categorization has been developed to provide a convenient arrangement of these features. RESULTS: The framework distinguishes between application-dependent and application-independent features of TSs. Definitions are provided for measures of content coverage, which was identified as the only application-dependent feature. Application-independent features are categorized along two axes: their respective type of TS and the particular element within that system, i.e. the formalism, the content, or the functionality. For each feature we provide an explicit question, the answer to which yields a feature value. The framework has been applied to SNOMED CT and the CLUE browser. CONCLUSIONS: We present and apply a framework to support a feature-based characterization of terminological systems. Standardized methods for content coverage studies reduce the effort of assessing the applicability of a TS for a specific clinical setting. A two-axial categorization provides a convenient arrangement of the large number of application-independent features. Application of the framework increases comparability of terminological systems. This framework may also help TS developers determine how their system can be improved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Cornet, N F de Keizer, A Abu-Hanna. 2006. A framework for characterizing terminological systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16685333/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mobile healthcare informatics.

Advances in wireless technology give pace to the rapid development of mobile applications. The coming mobile revolution will bring dramatic and fundamental changes to our daily life. It will influence the way we live, the way we do things, and the way we take care of our health. For the healthcare industry, mobile applications provide a new frontier in offering better care and services to patients, and a more flexible and mobile way of communicating with suppliers and patients. Mobile applications will provide important real time data for patients, physicians, insurers, and suppliers. In addition, it will revolutionalize the way information is managed in the healthcare industry and redefine the doctor - patient communication. This paper discusses different aspects of mobile healthcare. Specifically, it presents mobile applications in healthcare, and discusses possible challenges facing the development of mobile applications. Obstacles in developing mobile healthcare applications include mobile device limitations, wireless networking problems, infrastructure constraints, security concerns, and user distrust. Research issues in resolving or alleviating these problems are also discussed in the paper.

Medical Informatics Applications↗

The development of MML (Medical Markup Language) version 3.0 as a medical document exchange format for HL7 messages.

Medical Markup Language (MML), as a set of standards, has been developed over the last 8 years to allow the exchange of medical data between different medical information providers. MML Version 2.21 used XML as a metalanguage and was announced in 1999. In 2001, MML was updated to Version 2.3, which contained 12 modules. The latest version--Version 3.0--is based on the HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA). During the development of this new version, the structure of MML Version 2.3 was analyzed, subdivided into several categories, and redefined so the information defined in MML could be described in HL7 CDA Level One. As a result of this development, it has become possible to exchange MML Version 3.0 medical documents via HL7 messages.

Medical Informatics Applications↗