Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16679200

Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.

Abstract

Obtaining accurate images of the craniofacial region is critical when developing an orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan. The purpose of this article is to describe a new imaging method that provides complete 3-dimensional views of the maxilla and the mandible, and the model setup with individual anatomic roots. The method uses computed tomography technology and laser scanning; it offers high-resolution images with relatively low radiation exposure. Technical aspects of the new procedure and its possible uses for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aldo Macchi, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Vittorio Cacciafesta, Antonio Norcini. 2006. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perceptions of orthognathic surgery patient's change in profile. A five-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To compare pairs of silhouettes generated from presurgical and 5-year postsurgical cephalometric radiographs to evaluate whether orthodontists, oral surgeons, and lay persons perceive changes in profile resulting from orthodontics and mandibular advancement surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey-based method of data collection was used to evaluate 15 pairs of silhouettes. These silhouettes included 1 control pair and 14 surgically treated pairs representing mandibular advancements ranging from 0.11 mm to 10.13 mm. Collected data were analyzed to determine whether changes can be perceived and whether these changes were esthetically pleasing. RESULTS: The control silhouette pair was identified by 104 of 127 evaluators. For the 14 surgical treated silhouette pairs, the vast majority of evaluators (N = 127; 53 orthodontists, 32 oral surgeons, and 42 lay persons) were able to identify changes in profile and individual features. At least one group of evaluators was able to perceive significant (P < .05) improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for all these silhouette pairs, except for the pair with 10.13 mm of mandibular advancement. This silhouette pair, which represented the largest mandibular advancement, was perceived to have a significant (P < .05) worsening in the VAS score by the lay person group. There were significant differences among the groups of evaluators. Esthetic improvement in profile was perceived for 13 of 14 surgically treated silhouette pairs. CONCLUSION: In some cases, orthodontists, oral surgeons, and lay persons perceived changes in profile differently.

Cephalometry↗

Effects of cervical headgear on overbite against the background of existing growth patterns. A retrospective analysis of study casts.

OBJECTIVE: To test the questions "Does cervical headgear treatment necessarily lead to a reduction of overbite?" and "Are there differences in treatment results due to different growth patterns or the initial overbite?" MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial and intermediary casts of 247 patients who had been treated exclusively with headgear were analyzed for changes in the occlusal relationship of the first molars and overbite. Orthodontic treatment consisted of the application of cervical headgear with nonangulated external arms applied at a force of 3.5-4.0 N. Only patients showing dental changes of occlusal relationship > or = 4 mm during at least a 6-month treatment duration were selected. Growth patterns were identified by the y-axis values measured on lateral cephalograms obtained at study entry. Six groups were formed on the basis of these growth patterns. RESULTS: Headgear treatment induced bite deepening in patients with vertical growth patterns and bite opening in patients with horizontal growth patterns. Further subdivision based on initial overbite revealed bite deepening in patients with small initial overbite and bite opening in patients with large initial overbite. These differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Only minor changes were observed in patients with an initial overbite of 3-4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Overbite reductions were not dependent on the growth pattern. Orthodontists should expect bite opening in deep-bite situations and bite deepening in open-bite situations. However, initial overbite situations of 3-4 mm should not be expected to change in a significant way.

Cephalometry↗

Anterior open bite treated with a palatal crib and high-pull chin cup therapy. A prospective randomized study.

The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study was to cephalometrically investigate the dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes produced by a removable appliance with a palatal crib associated with high-pull chin cup therapy in children with an Angle Class I anterior open bite (AOB) malocclusion. Thirty children (8 males and 22 females) with an initial mean age of 8.3 years and a mean AOB of 4.1 mm were treated with a removable appliance composed of a palatal crib associated with chin cup therapy for 12 months. A control group of 30 individuals (7 males and 23 females) closely matched for age, initial mean age 8.6 years, gender, and ethnicity with a mean AOB of 4.6 mm was followed without treatment. The measurements (means and standard deviations) were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. The results showed no significant differences in the level of molar eruption or in lower anterior face height, suggesting that the vertical control expected from the chin cup therapy did not occur. Dentoalveolar changes at the anterior region were evident, with statistically significant extrusion, retrusion, and lingual tipping of the maxillary and mandibular incisors (P < or = 0.05). However, these hard tissue changes did not imply soft tissue changes and the variables related to the soft profile were not statistically significantly different between the groups. The dentoalveolar changes at the anterior region of the dental arches were mainly responsible for closure of the AOB in patients treated in the mixed dentition.

Cephalometry↗