Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16547443

Multimodality stroke prevention.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevention harbors the greatest potential for reducing the societal burden from stroke. As evidence accumulates on the multifactorial pathogenesis of vascular disease and the impact of novel combination therapies targeted at reducing recurrent vascular events, a new paradigm is emerging, which is that of multimodality vascular prevention. Knowledge of the evidence behind this strategy and the effective means for implementing it could be useful to the practicing neurologist taking care of stroke patients. REVIEW SUMMARY: Our review presents the evidence behind the broadening therapeutic options for recurrent vascular event prevention in ischemic stroke patients whose underlying stroke pathophysiologic mechanism is either presumed to be due to atherosclerosis or who have prior evidence of systemic atherosclerosis. We elaborate on conventional and novel vascular risk factors, as well as risk factor prediction models. Therapies discussed include antithrombotics, statins, antihypertensives, surgical/endovascular treatments, and lifestyle modification. Basis for evidence (or the lack thereof), national guideline recommendations, areas of controversy, and avenues of future focus for these treatments are also discussed in this paper. Furthermore, the knowledge-treatment gap as it pertains to optimal vascular risk-factor control and appropriate initiation and maintenance of evidence-based preventive therapies is explored, and an effective hospital-based intervention involving the in-hospital initiation of these treatments prior to discharge, that may help bridge this gap, is detailed. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologists should be aware that a timely, systematic, evidence-based multimodal preventive approach to atherothrombotic disease in stroke patients that transcends the continuum of care across points of service will likely increase treatment rates and improve clinical outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nerses Sanossian, Bruce Ovbiagele. 2006. Multimodality stroke prevention.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nrl.0000186808.07659.c7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Drugs modulating endothelial function after transplantation.

Endothelial cells play a vital role in the success or failure of a transplant procedure. The procedure itself can be viewed as a series of insults that damages the endothelium thereby triggering an inflammatory cascade that may, if uncontrolled, drive the proliferative and fibrotic processes characteristic of chronic graft vasculopathy. Unfortunately, many immunosuppressant agents contribute to this process. Glucocorticoids and the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine induce endothelial dysfunction, and although tacrolimus may not have the same disruptive effects on endothelial function as cyclosporine, its endothelial activity is still being established. In contrast, antiproliferative agents slow the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells and so help protect against graft vasculopathy. Researchers agree that endothelial cell dysfunction is a potentially treatable stage in the multifactorial process of graft vasculopathy and rejection. A number of cardiovascular agents (statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers), immunoregulatory drugs, and dietary compounds have been shown to have beneficial effects on endothelial function. We briefly review the evidence supporting their use as protection for endothelial cells in transplant recipients.

Cardiovascular Agents↗

Treatment of chronic heart failure: a comparison between the major guidelines.

Because of rapid advances in the treatment of chronic heart failure, four important guidelines, including those from the European Society of Cardiology, have recently been updated. This review compares and contrasts the levels of evidence and classes of recommendation given to each of the key pharmacological and device therapies advocated by these guidelines. Possible explanations for discrepancies between the guidelines are discussed. Future approaches that might clarify the grade of evidence allocated and class of recommendation made are also described.

Cardiovascular Agents↗

Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials.

Active-control noninferiority trials are being performed with increasing frequency when standard placebo-controlled trials are considered unethical. Three attributes are optimally required to establish noninferiority: 1) The treatment under consideration exhibits therapeutic noninferiority to the active control; 2) the treatment would exhibit therapeutic efficacy in a placebo-controlled trial if such a trial were to be performed; and 3) the treatment offers ancillary advantages in safety, tolerability, cost, or convenience. Trials designed to show noninferiority require an appropriate reference population, a proven active control and dose, a high level of adherence to treatment, and adequate statistical power. However, the formal analysis of such trials is founded on several assumptions that cannot be validated explicitly. These assumptions are evaluated in the context of 8 recently published noninferiority trials. The analyses in this paper confirm the establishment of noninferiority in only 4 of the 8 trials. The authors conclude that if noninferiority trials are to be applied to clinical and regulatory decisions about the marketing and use of new treatments, these assumptions must be made explicit and their influence on the resultant conclusions assessed rigorously.

Cardiovascular Agents↗