Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1642563

Fitting multichannel-compression hearing aids.

W A Dreschler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multichannel hearing aids have been introduced recently in clinical practice. In this paper, some advantages and disadvantages of multichannel hearing aids are discussed. The advantages include an improved use of compression. However, the number of settings will be larger in multichannel hearing aids and exact knowledge of the goal to be pursued by compression is more necessary than ever. Inexactness of the definitions of these goals may have been a reason for the contradictory results in the studies on multichannel compression. A number of requirements must be fulfilled for a successful application of multichannel compression. One of these is detailed knowledge about the perception of suprathreshold signals. For that reason, an extension of the battery of tests commonly used in rehabilitative audiology is necessary. Another requirement is that the fitting strategy is determined by the purpose of applying compression. The objectives will be different for compression limiting and syllabic compression. A fitting procedure used in clinical practice has to take into account some limitations in the fitting time available. A number of possible fitting tools are discussed. Two strongly different fitting strategies for the same commercially available three-channel compression aid illustrate fundamental differences in fitting philosophy.

Explore related subjects

Audiometry, Pure-ToneEquipment DesignFemaleHearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansLoudness PerceptionMaleSpeech PerceptionJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Dreschler. 1992. Fitting multichannel-compression hearing aids.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099209072907

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

[Hyperacusis after tympanoplasty].

A case of hyperacusis after tympanoplasty is presented. A 62-year-old woman experienced unilateral conductive hearing loss for about 60 years after antrotomy in infancy. Neurological or otoneurological symptoms were not evident. Tympanotomy showed a missing incus with discontinuity of the chain. Reconstruction was performed by interposition of a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP). The postoperative audiogram revealed minimal perceptive hearing loss in the high-frequency field in the operated ear. Several weeks after middle ear surgery, the patient complained of hyperacusis on the operated side, which persisted for more than 2 years. To alleviate the unpleasant sensations, an ear plug was used by the patient. In spite of the asymmetric hearing loss, no late onset auditory deprivation could be diagnosed. The pathophysiological causes of the hyperacusis have not yet been clarified. Possible reasons are discussed.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of the use of a questionnaire to detect hearing loss in Kenyan pre-school children.

In developing countries, there is a lack of trained personnel and testing equipment to facilitate the early detection of hearing impairment in children. A questionnaire offers a low cost option and the value of this for detecting hearing impairment in pre-school children was determined in several districts in Kenya. The questionnaire was completed by either teachers, parents/carers or community nurses. The children were subsequently tested using pure tone audiometry and visual examination of the ear by ENT Clinical Officers, who were not given prior access to the results of the questionnaire. A total of 757 (88%) questionnaires were completed. Of the 735 children, who could be tested using pure tone audiometry, four were found to have a unilateral hearing impairment and one was detected by the questionnaire. A total of 13 children had a bilateral hearing impairment >40 dB HL. All were detected using the questionnaire. There were eight males and five females with ages ranging from 4.2 to 6.9 years, mean age 5.7 years and median age 5.8 years. Eight had a sensorineural hearing impairment and two a mixed hearing impairment. Three of the children with a sensorineural hearing loss had a family history of hearing impairment. No question detected all children with a hearing impairment and some questions were more discerning than others. There was 100% sensitivity for the questionnaire when a hearing loss of >40 dB was considered, but specificity was lower at 75%. Negative predictive value was 100%, but the positive predictive value was low, 6.75%. It was concluded that a questionnaire of this nature could be usefully applied at Primary Health Care level for detecting hearing impairment at the pre-school stage. There would be need for services available for diagnosis, treatment and habilitation before a screening programme was introduced.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone↗