Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16422992

Priapism.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are three different types of priapism: low-flow, ischemic, anoxic or veno-occlusive priapism; high-flow, arterial or nonischemic priapism; and recurrent or stuttering priapism. AIM: To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for the diagnosis and treatment of priapism. METHODS: An International Consultation in collaboration with the major urology and sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various male and female sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. Concerning the Priapism Committee, there were 10 experts from six countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate. RESULTS: Concerning ischemic priapism, persistent cavernous smooth muscle relaxation and failure of contraction is a compartment syndrome with increasing intracavernosal anoxia, rising pCO2 and acidosis. Urgent medical attention should be sought for an erection lasting >4 hours; 90% with priapism >24 hours develop complete erectile dysfunction. After diagnosis and counselling, intracavernosal aspiration and alpha-blockers should precede surgical shunting. Concerning high-flow priapism (congenital, traumatic or iatrogenic), intervention is not urgent and often unnecessary. Definitive management is by selective embolization with autologous blood clot. Concerning recurrent/stuttering priapism, the pathophysiology may be central or local (sickle cell disease). Management needs to be individualized; androgen deprivation has proved useful but has adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is need for prospective, clinical trials to define safe and effective management strategies for patients with low-flow, high-flow or recurrent priapism.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John Pryor, Emre Akkus, Gary Alter, Gerald Jordan, Thierry Lebret, Laurence Levine, John Mulhall, Sava Perovic, David Ralph, Walter Stackl. 2004. Priapism.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10117.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Staging and measurement of renal function in chronic renal conditions].

Kidney failure has traditionally been categorised as mild, moderate or severe. Other poorly defined terms like uraemia and end-stage kidney disease have commonly been applied. During the last few years, an international consensus has emerged staging chronic kidney disease into 5 stages: stage 1 being glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 90 ml/min and signs of kidney damage, stage 2 GFR 60-89 ml/min and signs of kidney damage, stage 3 being GFR 30-59 ml/min, stage 4 being GFR 15-29 ml/min, and stage 5 GFR < 15 ml/min. Kidney function should be calculated from creatinine-based formulas, or measured by isotope or iohexol clearances rather than as renal clearance of creatinine in timed urine samples. We address the importance and implications of these new definitions.

Consensus↗

Radiographic measurement techniques for sacral fractures consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: Members of the Spine Trauma Study Group evaluated various imaging methods and compiled standardized approaches to making radiographic measurements for the assessment of sacral fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The diagnosis of sacral fractures is frequently missed or delayed, and the treatment is controversial, with significant variations in recommendations regarding nonoperative treatment, neural decompression, and internal fixation. A paucity of specific radiographic measurements and criteria exist to aid the clinician in making sound treatment decisions. This may obligate surgeons to base clinical decisions on nonstandardized, nonvalidated recommendations and measures and, in some cases, anecdotal evidence. We think that a critical first step toward valid and optimal clinical decision-making requires an accurate and clear definition of imaging measurement parameters used to evaluate sacral injuries and gather data for future studies. METHODS: A review of the English-speaking literature was performed to assess cited radiographic measurement techniques of sacral fractures currently in use. This allowed the formulation of detailed radiographic assessments designed to more reliably describe sacral fracture morphometry. RESULTS: These measurements include: anterior-posterior sacral fracture displacement (axial computed tomography [CT] of the pelvis), vertical sacral fracture displacement (coronal CT reconstruction), anterior-posterior translation and kyphotic angulation (sagittal CT reconstructions), and degree of central canal involvement and foraminal encroachment (axial CT with fine cuts and coronal and sagittal reconstructions). Other radiographic factors that should be considered that may impact treatment outcomes include the level and type of sacral fracture, lumbosacral junction and sacroiliac joint involvement, and associated pelvic ring injury. CONCLUSIONS: With adoption of these radiographic guidelines, future studies will have a uniform method in which to describe sacral injuries and therefore allow study of the efficacy of various recommended treatment protocols.

Consensus↗