Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16321696

Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Maya E Guglin·Deepak Thatai
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and nature of errors in computer electrocardiogram (ECG) reading. METHODS: The ECGs were collected in the tertiary care VA Hospital from both inpatients and outpatients. They were read by the electrocardiograph built-in computer software, and then reread by two cardiologists. Statistical analysis was performed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value to analyze the data. An error index was formulated as indicator of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Out of 2072 ECGs, 776 (37.5%) were normal, and 1296 (62.5%) were abnormal. In 9.9% of all ECGs and in 15.9% of abnormal ECGs there were significant disagreements between the computer and cardiologists. The errors in diagnosis of arrhythmia, conduction disorders and electronic pacemakers accounted for 178 cases, or 86.4% of all errors. The rest was represented by misdetection of chamber enlargement (7 cases, 3.4%), misdiagnosis of ischemia and acute myocardial infarction (16 cases, 7.8%), and lead misplacement (5 cases, 2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent errors in computer ECG interpretation are related to arrhythmias, conduction disorders, and electronic pacemakers. Computer ECG diagnosis of life threatening conditions e.g. acute myocardial infarction or high degree AV blocks are frequently not accurate (40.7% and 75.0% errors, respectively). Improvement in the diagnostic algorithms should focus on these areas. Error index is a convenient and informative tool for evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ErrorsElectrocardiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maya E Guglin, Deepak Thatai. 2006-01-13. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.02.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Can the clinical history distinguish between organic and functional dyspepsia?

CONTEXT: Upper gastrointestinal symptoms occur in 40% of the population. An accurate diagnosis would help rationalize investigation and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature of the accuracy of primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, or computer models in diagnosing organic dyspepsia. DATA SOURCES: A search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (December 2003), MEDLINE (1966-December 2003), EMBASE (1988-December 2003), and CINAHL (1982-December 2003) for studies that reported on cohorts of patients attending for endoscopy that had symptoms, clinical opinion, or both recorded before investigation. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that prospectively compared the diagnosis reached by a clinician, computer model, or both with results of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently assessed studies (n = 79) for eligibility and abstracted data for estimating likelihood ratios (LRs) of clinical opinion, computer models, or both in diagnosing an organic cause for dyspepsia. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifteen studies were identified that evaluated 11 366 patients, with 4817 patients (42%) classified as having organic dyspepsia. The computer models performed similarly to the clinician; therefore, the 2 approaches were combined. The diagnosis reached by the clinician or computer model suggesting organic dyspepsia had an LR of 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.8), and a negative result decreased the likelihood of organic dyspepsia (LR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.55). A diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease performed similarly with an LR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.9-2.6), but an evaluation that suggested the absence of peptic ulcer disease had an LR of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38-0.53). A clinical history suggesting esophagitis had an LR of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.9-3.0) vs a negative history that had an LR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.42-0.60). CONCLUSION: Neither clinical impression nor computer models that incorporated patient demographics, risk factors, history items, and symptoms adequately distinguished between organic and functional disease in patients referred for endoscopic evaluation of dyspepsia.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed2006

A portable bio-impedance system for monitoring lung resistivity.

The principles of a hybrid bio-impedance technique are implemented in a novel, lung resistivity monitoring system ("CardioInspect" Tel-Aviv University, Israel). The system is to be utilized in the clinic or at home, for daily monitoring of patients suffering from pulmonary edema. The developed system consists of an eight-electrode belt worn around the thorax, an electronic unit containing analog and digital boards, and a stand-alone DSP based system with a designated software to analyze the data. A Newton-Raphson algorithm based on the finite-volume method is employed for the optimization of the left and right lung resistivity values, making use of the voltage measurements retrieved from opposite current injections. In this preliminary study, 33 healthy volunteers were measured with the system during tidal respiration, yielding symmetric mean left and right lung resistivity values of (1205+/-163, 1200+/-165) (Omega cm). The system reproducibility was better than 2% for both within and between tests measurements, and no dependency between the reconstructed values and various anthropometric parameters was found.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗