Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16298725

Tolerance does not develop to the decrease in nicotine self-administration produced by repeated bupropion administration.

Abstract

The atypical antidepressant bupropion has been shown to be an efficacious smoking cessation agent; however, its therapeutic mechanism of action is unknown. To further understand the mechanism by which bupropion reduces smoking, the present study determined the effect of repeated bupropion pretreatment on nicotine self-administration or sucrose-maintained responding. Rats were trained to self-administer intravenous nicotine (0.02 mg/kg/infusion; Experiment 1) or to respond for sucrose pellets (45 mg each; Experiment 2) on a fixed-ratio 5 schedule. Once rats reached stable responding, bupropion (70 mg/kg, subcutaneously) or vehicle was injected 15 min before the session for 14 consecutive sessions. Bupropion acutely decreased both nicotine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding by approximately 60%-70%. With repeated bupropion pretreatment, however, responding for nicotine decreased completely. In contrast, the bupropion-induced decrease in responding for sucrose following acute administration did not change significantly with repeated bupropion administration. These results suggest that bupropion acquired some specificity with repeated use, decreasing the intake of nicotine and producing an extinction-like pattern in nicotine self-administration. Thus the present results parallel human clinical studies with bupropion demonstrating its smoking cessation properties following repeated treatment. These results indicate that the rat nicotine self-administration paradigm is a useful animal model for assessing smoking cessation pharmacotherapies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony S Rauhut, Linda P Dwoskin, Michael T Bardo. 2005. Tolerance does not develop to the decrease in nicotine self-administration produced by repeated bupropion administration.. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200500381384

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks.

We examine several variance estimators for cumulative incidence estimators that have been proposed over time, some of which are derived from asymptotic martingale or counting process theory, and some of which are developed from the moments of the multinomial distribution. There is little published work comparing these variance estimators, largely because the variance estimators are algebraically complex and difficult to interpret and all but one have yet to be programmed for a standard statistical package. Through simulation and application to real data, we compare the performance of six variance estimators in relation to each other and the bootstrap in order to confirm earlier reports of their performance and to provide future direction toward their application. We find that the multinomial-moment-based estimators have performance close to that of the bootstrap, and are quite accurate for estimating the variance, even in samples of 20 subjects. All but one of the martingale theory-based estimators tend to perform poorly in small samples, tending to either overestimate or underestimate the empirical variance in samples of fewer than 100 subjects.

Analysis of Variance↗