Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1613042

Radial nerve compression.

Abstract

Symptomatic radial nerve compression is relatively uncommon. A relatively high incidence of compressive neuropathy involves other major nerves in the same extremity. Because sensory complaints are minor, radial nerve compression may successfully masquerade as tendonitis or tendon rupture. The most common site of radial nerve compression is in the forearm, at the arcade of Frohse. Spontaneous onset of dense paralysis is often due to space-occupying lesions in the forearm. Trauma-related compression in the forearm is most often due to radial head dislocation and either humeral fracture or local external pressure in the upper arm. Compression resulting in weakness that does not improve with several months of splinting, anti-inflammatory medication, and activity changes should be treated surgically to reduce the extent of permanent deficit. After decompression, early active motion is instituted to encourage nerve gliding. Results after decompression are not as favorable as those for carpal or cubital tunnel release. The worst results of decompression are seen in patients who have work-related injuries, chronic pain, and poor localization of symptoms on physical examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Eaton, G D Lister. 1992. Radial nerve compression.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1613042/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Genetics, mental retardation, and the forging of new alliances.

The lives of people with intellectual disabilities are tightly intermeshed with the philosophies and practices of special educators, therapists, psychologists, social workers, and others who make up the mental retardation field. These nonmedical workers represent a kind of extended family, which can strongly influence the decisions made and services received by the people they serve. By contrast, most individuals with mental retardation do not have extraordinary medical needs, and healthcare professionals play only a minor role in their human services family. There are deeply rooted historical differences between the medical model of mental retardation with which genetics professionals are familiar and the philosophies embraced by nonmedical workers who dominate the mental retardation field. These contrasts have an important impact on the genetic diagnostic process, as well as a more global effect on mental retardation research. Without the full participation of teachers, therapists, psychologists, and others outside the medical setting, many practical applications of genetic research can neither be implemented nor expanded upon, and an important opportunity for cross-fertilization is lost. It is in the interest of the genetics community to take advantage of recent overtures by the mental retardation field to forge new alliances and broaden its perspectives on intellectual disability.

Diagnosis, Differential↗